Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] mm: process_vm_mmap() -- syscall for duplication
 a process mapping
To:     Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        mhocko@suse.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
        andreyknvl@google.com, arunks@codeaurora.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
        cl@linux.com, riel@surriel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com,
        aarcange@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
References: <155793276388.13922.18064660723547377633.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
 <20190515193841.GA29728@angband.pl>
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Message-ID: <7136aa47-3ce5-243d-6c92-5893b7b1379d@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 16:10:07 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190515193841.GA29728@angband.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Adam,

On 15.05.2019 22:38, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 06:11:15PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> This patchset adds a new syscall, which makes possible
>> to clone a mapping from a process to another process.
>> The syscall supplements the functionality provided
>> by process_vm_writev() and process_vm_readv() syscalls,
>> and it may be useful in many situation.
>>
>> For example, it allows to make a zero copy of data,
>> when process_vm_writev() was previously used:
> 
> I wonder, why not optimize the existing interfaces to do zero copy if
> properly aligned?  No need for a new syscall, and old code would immediately
> benefit.

Because, this is just not possible. You can't zero copy anonymous pages
of a process to pages of a remote process, when they are different pages.

>> There are several problems with process_vm_writev() in this example:
>>
>> 1)it causes pagefault on remote process memory, and it forces
>>   allocation of a new page (if was not preallocated);
>>
>> 2)amount of memory for this example is doubled in a moment --
>>   n pages in current and n pages in remote tasks are occupied
>>   at the same time;
>>
>> 3)received data has no a chance to be properly swapped for
>>   a long time.
> 
> That'll handle all of your above problems, except for making pages
> subject to CoW if written to.  But if making pages writeably shared is
> desired, the old functions have a "flags" argument that doesn't yet have a
> single bit defined.

Kirill