Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 16:59:42 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] uapi: Wire up the mount API syscalls on non-x86
 arches [ver #2]
Message-ID: <20190516145941.dzlf4kxrxoeeoa6t@brauner.io>
References: <155800752418.4037.9567789434648701032.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <155800755482.4037.14407450837395686732.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <CAMuHMdWsgSWC2AFGf_XBaEc0g=FDkGB1=UH+Ekh9n6k3W4ifWQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWsgSWC2AFGf_XBaEc0g=FDkGB1=UH+Ekh9n6k3W4ifWQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi David, Christian,
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Wire up the mount API syscalls on non-x86 arches.
> >
> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> > +428    common  open_tree                       sys_open_tree
> > +429    common  move_mount                      sys_move_mount
> > +430    common  fsopen                          sys_fsopen
> > +431    common  fsconfig                        sys_fsconfig
> > +432    common  fsmount                         sys_fsmount
> > +433    common  fspick                          sys_fspick
> 
> The first number conflicts with "[PATCH v1 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open()".
> 
> Note that none of this is part of linux-next.

Yep, already spotted this thanks to Arnd.
David, there's nothing you need to do of course. I'll change the syscall
number for pidfd_open(). Your patchset obviously has priority!

Thanks!
Christian

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds