Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 14:48:19 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc:     Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>, arnd@arndb.de, arm@kernel.org,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        robin.murphy@arm.com, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, kgene@kernel.org,
        krzk@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, ssantosh@kernel.org,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr,
        mans@mansr.com, ndesaulniers@google.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch
 argument
Message-ID: <20190516214819.dopw4eiumt6is46e@localhost>
References: <f48c245e7e2b432f6771a5f97ff9f4b5bedc5089.1554968922.git.stefan@agner.ch>
 <2f3d0fa7ba599f46960ad3e7419477fd@agner.ch>
 <20190424141217.GC8007@atomide.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190424141217.GC8007@atomide.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:12:17AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> [190423 20:20]:
> > On 11.04.2019 09:54, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > > The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
> > > extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
> > > to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
> > > errors such as this:
> > >   clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
> > > 
> > > Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
> > > portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
> > > multi-platform kernel is being built.
> > > 
> > > Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
> > > checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
> > > However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
> > > unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
> > > ".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
> > > arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
> > > its documentation [1].
> > > 
> > > [0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
> > > [1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> > > Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Arnd, Tony,
> > 
> > Patch 3 and 4 got merged by Gregory. I think the other two patches are
> > ready to be merged too. I think they should go in together to avoid
> > merge conflicts. Tony, if you agree, can you Ack patch 2 so they can get
> > merged through arm-soc?
> 
> Sure I just acked it for you.

Hi,

These came in right around when I did the last patches for this merge
window. I'll apply them once -rc1 is out for next release.


-Olof