Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932385AbVKLOWu (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:22:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932386AbVKLOWu (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:22:50 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55764 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932385AbVKLOWu (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:22:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:23:04 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tom Rini Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14-rt11 2/3] Switch to using get_cycles() rather than get_cpu_tick() Message-ID: <20051112142304.GB24163@elte.hu> References: <20051111204312.11609.23222.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20051111204322.11609.61829.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051111204322.11609.61829.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 705 Lines: 19 * Tom Rini wrote: > In a few different drivers we had what boiled down to a custom > implementation of get_cycles(). On i386 and ppc32 this was the same > code, and I assume similar for ARM and MIPS. In one case > (kernel/latency.c) it really was get_cycles() in the !i386 case. > Always using get_cycles() makes new platform bringup easier. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini thanks, applied. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/