Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 09:42:48 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     parna.naveenkumar@gmail.com
Cc:     johan@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: mos7840: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use
 of 'unsigned'
Message-ID: <20190517074248.GD28564@localhost>
References: <20190516130759.12996-1-parna.naveenkumar@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190516130759.12996-1-parna.naveenkumar@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:37:59PM +0530, parna.naveenkumar@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Naveen Kumar Parna <parna.naveenkumar@gmail.com>
> 
> This fixes checkpatch.pl warning "WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to
> bare use of 'unsigned'".

Please don't run checkpatch.pl on code that already in the kernel
(possibly with the exception of staging). Use it on your own patches
before you submit them if you want, and even then don't blindly follow
what checkpatch says.

Minor coding style issues are better left alone to avoid adding noise
and making code forensic and backports harder.

And in this case, there's not even anything wrong with the current code.

Johan