Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp1588072yba; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzz0yFn0Le4viLokUYTO0MAadQRJFjhkNtpwYBOnV8Xs8j5ibsHptVMZpl/7PLqt+Tt0ySi X-Received: by 2002:a63:af44:: with SMTP id s4mr54483432pgo.411.1558082386679; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558082386; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DhE+1xlB7DlVnDR3/OGTJxXmt3D0HYATrPOLW/bbCgo01Z38rPfBtrlbA6Nm/C7gSL Evw1s6OncuRApS30GN4ddw3U4ttxRrtm2kkwNPK7mPaQ8+3wggar8blVwfQFxvE7NMqw ivQn13OpgLZIBzqB9bXyOxw+/AD9m8yqHrDNramP8crUqrrm3noKCOfrePgH327x0IFC ONAJUjl8mdzT4xvSbFKeV7xkHlEAu0Ts4OVdWg6UK4yaZIXH8fIyG0pg04VIhXO8woMi Ygvd/W97lQBsoh3tZ8k+YBvFNSLrjzf/2o8XP91bFccReIDPC0i94m/6/ewXpS9oyJkL JQLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=+6h9T/Jt9MEk+4Kzg74aUhHaYv7xmP8szbeOV/BUq0s=; b=PK5iiksvB3U6iOITDpZJ/drtHVbg9xfFZ2ZETsz32mo3LX02iMp1fDqYHeHJqFBzNz Z8AAobfjiJjfrIr9qKKuVQNpv4Zi0v7GM22ylBMAE84q0hZucNkGq20SGDZOUJ4nHhvZ VbAEvZO7gau+EdZ5QVDi07cgxFpqwdidECPFScGOxMijgQ+raYjTlWFNTBz5qBR6yCt7 qPHA+Q9hfqpJboMdAvctPNpcwy/0clalTSpXG+QOkTlWltoLROCm2SxmYdGFCUjRG/9l gSFYcU3QsYRvOVMELMaixIrGI+QSemi/f0ByewTk90b8t7eJeU1Fuf4W4tMaPmWI0lX0 8Ybw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si7728412pfo.13.2019.05.17.01.39.31; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728087AbfEQIEM (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 May 2019 04:04:12 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:7658 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727620AbfEQIEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 04:04:12 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9FD5DA080717BEF5EF82; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:04:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.31.96) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 17 May 2019 16:04:07 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix use-after-free in ip_vs_in To: Julian Anastasov References: <20190515093614.21176-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , , From: YueHaibing Message-ID: <9cb4160c-8aa7-8a0b-bbca-0c3ad2809db2@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:04:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.31.96] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/5/17 15:30, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 15 May 2019, YueHaibing wrote: > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ip_vs_in.part.29+0xe8/0xd20 [ip_vs] >> Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881e9b26e2c by task sshd/5603 >> >> CPU: 0 PID: 5603 Comm: sshd Not tainted 4.19.39+ #30 >> Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 >> Call Trace: >> dump_stack+0x71/0xab >> print_address_description+0x6a/0x270 >> kasan_report+0x179/0x2c0 >> ? ip_vs_in.part.29+0xe8/0xd20 [ip_vs] >> ip_vs_in.part.29+0xe8/0xd20 [ip_vs] >> ? tcp_in_window+0xfe0/0xfe0 [nf_conntrack] >> ? ip_vs_in_icmp+0xcc0/0xcc0 [ip_vs] >> ? ipt_do_table+0x4f1/0xad0 [ip_tables] >> ? ip_vs_out+0x126/0x8f0 [ip_vs] >> ? common_interrupt+0xa/0xf >> ip_vs_in+0xd8/0x170 [ip_vs] >> ? ip_vs_in.part.29+0xd20/0xd20 [ip_vs] >> ? nf_nat_ipv4_fn+0x21/0xc0 [nf_nat_ipv4] >> ? nf_nat_packet+0x4b/0x90 [nf_nat] >> ? nf_nat_ipv4_local_fn+0xf9/0x160 [nf_nat_ipv4] >> ? ip_vs_remote_request4+0x50/0x50 [ip_vs] >> nf_hook_slow+0x5f/0xe0 >> ? sock_write_iter+0x121/0x1c0 >> __ip_local_out+0x1d5/0x250 >> ? ip_finish_output+0x430/0x430 >> ? ip_forward_options+0x2d0/0x2d0 >> ? ip_copy_addrs+0x2d/0x40 >> ? __ip_queue_xmit+0x2ca/0x730 >> ip_local_out+0x19/0x60 >> __tcp_transmit_skb+0xba1/0x14f0 >> ? __tcp_select_window+0x330/0x330 >> ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xd1/0x180 >> ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20 >> ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 >> ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x100 >> tcp_write_xmit+0x41f/0x1ed0 >> ? _copy_from_iter_full+0xca/0x340 >> __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x52/0x140 >> tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x787/0x1600 >> ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x80/0x130 >> ? tcp_sendpage+0x60/0x60 >> ? remove_wait_queue+0x84/0xb0 >> ? mutex_unlock+0x1d/0x40 >> ? n_tty_read+0x4f7/0xd20 >> ? check_stack_object+0x21/0x60 >> ? inet_sk_set_state+0xb0/0xb0 >> tcp_sendmsg+0x27/0x40 >> sock_sendmsg+0x6d/0x80 >> sock_write_iter+0x121/0x1c0 >> ? sock_sendmsg+0x80/0x80 >> ? ldsem_up_read+0x13/0x40 >> ? iov_iter_init+0x77/0xb0 >> __vfs_write+0x23e/0x370 >> ? kernel_read+0xa0/0xa0 >> ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x134/0x900 >> ? __set_current_blocked+0x7e/0x90 >> ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x18e/0x1f0 >> ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0x51/0x70 >> vfs_write+0xe7/0x230 >> ksys_write+0xa1/0x120 >> ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50 >> ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x3ce/0x450 >> do_syscall_64+0x73/0x200 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 >> RIP: 0033:0x7ff6f6147c60 >> Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 28 12 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 5d 73 2d 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 >> RSP: 002b:00007ffd772ead18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 >> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000034 RCX: 00007ff6f6147c60 >> RDX: 0000000000000034 RSI: 000055df30a31270 RDI: 0000000000000003 >> RBP: 000055df30a31270 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 >> R10: 00007ffd772ead70 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd772ead74 >> R13: 00007ffd772eae20 R14: 00007ffd772eae24 R15: 000055df2f12ddc0 >> >> Allocated by task 6052: >> kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0 >> __kmalloc+0x10a/0x220 >> ops_init+0x97/0x190 >> register_pernet_operations+0x1ac/0x360 >> register_pernet_subsys+0x24/0x40 >> 0xffffffffc0ea016d >> do_one_initcall+0x8b/0x253 >> do_init_module+0xe3/0x335 >> load_module+0x2fc0/0x3890 >> __do_sys_finit_module+0x192/0x1c0 >> do_syscall_64+0x73/0x200 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 >> >> Freed by task 6067: >> __kasan_slab_free+0x130/0x180 >> kfree+0x90/0x1a0 >> ops_free_list.part.7+0xa6/0xc0 >> unregister_pernet_operations+0x18b/0x1f0 >> unregister_pernet_subsys+0x1d/0x30 >> ip_vs_cleanup+0x1d/0xd2f [ip_vs] >> __x64_sys_delete_module+0x20c/0x300 >> do_syscall_64+0x73/0x200 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 >> >> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881e9b26600 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4096 of size 4096 >> The buggy address is located 2092 bytes inside of 4096-byte region [ffff8881e9b26600, ffff8881e9b27600) >> The buggy address belongs to the page: >> page:ffffea0007a6c800 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888107c0e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 >> flags: 0x17ffffc0008100(slab|head) >> raw: 0017ffffc0008100 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff888107c0e600 >> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 >> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected >> >> Memory state around the buggy address: >> ffff8881e9b26d00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >> ffff8881e9b26d80: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >>> ffff8881e9b26e00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >> ^ >> ffff8881e9b26e80: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >> ffff8881e9b26f00: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >> >> while unregistering ipvs module, ops_free_list calls >> __ip_vs_cleanup, then nf_unregister_net_hooks be called to >> do remove nf hook entries. It need a RCU period to finish, >> however net->ipvs is set to NULL immediately, which will >> trigger NULL pointer dereference when a packet is hooked >> and handled by ip_vs_in where net->ipvs is dereferenced. >> >> Another scene is ops_free_list call ops_free to free the >> net_generic directly while __ip_vs_cleanup finished, then >> calling ip_vs_in will triggers use-after-free. > > OK, can you instead test and post a patch that moves > nf_unregister_net_hooks from __ip_vs_cleanup() to > __ip_vs_dev_cleanup()? You can add commit efe41606184e > in Fixes line. There is rcu_barrier() in unregister_pernet_device -> > unregister_pernet_operations that will do the needed grace > period. Ok, I will try it later, thanks! > > In a followup patch for net-next I'll drop the > ipvs->enable flag and will move the nf_register_net_hooks() > call to ip_vs_add_service() just before the 'svc = kzalloc' > part. So, for now you do not need to move nf_register_net_hooks. > As result, hooks will be registered when there are IPVS rules. > >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot >> Fixes: efe41606184e ("ipvs: convert to use pernet nf_hook api") >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing >> --- >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c >> index 1445755..33205db 100644 >> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c >> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c >> @@ -2320,6 +2320,7 @@ static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup(struct net *net) >> ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(ipvs); >> ip_vs_estimator_net_cleanup(ipvs); >> IP_VS_DBG(2, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen); >> + synchronize_net(); >> net->ipvs = NULL; >> } > > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov > > . >