Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABWYdi06NUOWRLingNuybgZZsTZPjhmsOx-9oCGK94qZGYbzcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72kvpiC-i53AXM-YsCUvWroHQemmqxsXjnB330ZEeHahUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABWYdi1zhTTaN-GSgH0DnPfz7p=SRw0wts5QVYYVtfvoiS0qnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72=fsL5m2_e+bNovFCHy3=YVf53EKGtGE_sWvsAD=ONHuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190516225013.nvhwqi5tfwtby6qb@treble> <CABWYdi29E++jBw8boFZAiDZA7iT5NiJhnNmiHb-Rvd9+97hSVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190517050931.GB32367@kroah.com> <20190517073813.GB2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190517073813.GB2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 10:35:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72nUPoNHWM-dJuFc3=4D2=8XMuvO0PgGPjviOv+EhrAWUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.19 and GCC 9
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:38 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 07:09:31AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:14:25PM -0700, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> > > We are building the upstream kernel. There are a few patches, but
> > > nothing related to objtool.
> > >
> > > Unless you mean mainline/stable by upstream, I haven't tried that. We
> > > stick to LTS.
> >
> > Please work and all of these issues fixed up in Linus's tree and then I
> > will be glad to take the fixed into the stable releases.
>
> Right; if there is anything you can reproduce on linus.git I'll happily
> have a look. If it doesn't reproduce all you have to do is find the
> patches that make it work and ask Greg.

Just to clarify: Linus' master is clean of these issues with GCC 9.1.1.

Cheers,
Miguel