Received: by 2002:a25:4158:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o85csp2221292yba; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:45:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7zE4YenLsFfykGqv2Lj2ro4M/1wsone2W20QpinH33EB8tHW/+S0/P9YYW4yx5IsE9AUM X-Received: by 2002:a63:171c:: with SMTP id x28mr58263124pgl.12.1558122322644; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:45:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558122322; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dj/A7wCELXKz3QgyNuT+ybAqU1GbcgOqy81gCaBHFmV8V3o1kFaFRlhxnnX/+EJR6v u+27N4uHBBPZFj/FkYlpfe2vCEAjNbbS/kgIm2j2EDopI0Fu5t4uzqTbRBgAqoRq3IBD BUeME0WCtV7E7fBlJMUZMQsdWm6B0+RXIfJAGEofUKJ/BqHj642AiorqBQ8DfgJpUW8y h4FJunTF49rmT0/ML3i9kwkKzzMSKTKoN2GY6wTltFEzrjSkmD+8rh/zE/6ggaVR2+DL 0BhGeO0OZuM8mbQJ3BS91lSsoXd9Y5pKZcS9HrL2Z2HOd+7vTN9/ltIUerpLcPwT5w3D L1sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=8H8jN47StBj7vpy+aR15OeK47VsqcN+nzQwCHffMqE0=; b=JBoa1KmsmmJdyVv8RN9VRohsznIY31U2k26b+ABwqTq5ivHRPd3KsGYN9b6QU2nb46 RGjv7y7CUq6Z9WT+iynYlGZy3/E5giyIgfdcKHxVH/OZuHych0MUcEvLuMZJBz1u/Tag uuK4p3aAGMuEQ6UGA3uTI5s1p2wb3xI4J7T6flcY37PbUHTuACkJD2Sy1y2VsA3jxzBk JKJxR4IHseU//TB5IMRyymd8hxyQxrd7f/bELKHzcxtikLF/7QWUe6G0thQbHGSU2u2O 8zmAB2TR4gArRgS35y9Aan12x4WHcCUrrjLaEJuX/JfDvliOMc/fwVCfo13fZYc3X/GG +/6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g14si8843487plm.192.2019.05.17.12.45.08; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729041AbfEQToG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:44:06 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:41554 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726851AbfEQToG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 15:44:06 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2019 12:44:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from agluck-desk.sc.intel.com (HELO agluck-desk) ([10.3.52.160]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 May 2019 12:44:05 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:44:05 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "Ghannam, Yazen" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in hardware Message-ID: <20190517194405.GA28795@agluck-desk> References: <20190516203456.GD21857@zn.tnic> <20190516205943.GA3299@agluck-desk> <20190517101006.GA32065@zn.tnic> <20190517163729.GE13482@zn.tnic> <20190517172648.GA18164@agluck-desk> <20190517174817.GG13482@zn.tnic> <20190517180607.GA21710@agluck-desk> <20190517193431.GI13482@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190517193431.GI13482@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:06:07AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > and thus end up with that extra level on indent for the rest > > of the function. > > Ok: > > @@ -1569,7 +1575,13 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_clear_banks(void) > > if (!b->init) > continue; > + > + /* Check if any bits are implemented in h/w */ > wrmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), b->ctl); > + rdmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), msrval); > + > + b->init = !!msrval; > + > wrmsrl(msr_ops.status(i), 0); > } Much neater :-) Acked-by: Tony Luck