Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 21:34:31 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
        "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in
 hardware
Message-ID: <20190517193431.GI13482@zn.tnic>
References: <20190516172117.GC21857@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB26394CD4E1BAC068B0B1AEF6F80A0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190516203456.GD21857@zn.tnic>
 <20190516205943.GA3299@agluck-desk>
 <20190517101006.GA32065@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB26391A0C3979030082EE38F8F80B0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190517163729.GE13482@zn.tnic>
 <20190517172648.GA18164@agluck-desk>
 <20190517174817.GG13482@zn.tnic>
 <20190517180607.GA21710@agluck-desk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190517180607.GA21710@agluck-desk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:06:07AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> and thus end up with that extra level on indent for the rest
> of the function.

Ok:

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
index 5bcecadcf4d9..25e501a853cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
@@ -1493,6 +1493,11 @@ static int __mcheck_cpu_mce_banks_init(void)
 	for (i = 0; i < n_banks; i++) {
 		struct mce_bank *b = &mce_banks[i];
 
+		/*
+		 * Init them all, __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks() is going to apply
+		 * the required vendor quirks before
+		 * __mcheck_cpu_init_clear_banks() does the final bank setup.
+		 */
 		b->ctl = -1ULL;
 		b->init = 1;
 	}
@@ -1562,6 +1567,7 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_generic(void)
 static void __mcheck_cpu_init_clear_banks(void)
 {
 	struct mce_bank *mce_banks = this_cpu_read(mce_banks_array);
+	u64 msrval;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < this_cpu_read(mce_num_banks); i++) {
@@ -1569,7 +1575,13 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_clear_banks(void)
 
 		if (!b->init)
 			continue;
+
+		/* Check if any bits are implemented in h/w */
 		wrmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), b->ctl);
+		rdmsrl(msr_ops.ctl(i), msrval);
+
+		b->init = !!msrval;
+
 		wrmsrl(msr_ops.status(i), 0);
 	}
 }
@@ -2095,6 +2107,9 @@ static ssize_t show_bank(struct device *s, struct device_attribute *attr,
 
 	b = &per_cpu(mce_banks_array, s->id)[bank];
 
+	if (!b->init)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	return sprintf(buf, "%llx\n", b->ctl);
 }
 
@@ -2113,6 +2128,9 @@ static ssize_t set_bank(struct device *s, struct device_attribute *attr,
 
 	b = &per_cpu(mce_banks_array, s->id)[bank];
 
+	if (!b->init)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	b->ctl = new;
 	mce_restart();
 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.