Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932280AbVKMMqU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:46:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932494AbVKMMqU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:46:20 -0500 Received: from H190.C26.B96.tor.eicat.ca ([66.96.26.190]:54147 "EHLO moraine.clusterfs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932280AbVKMMqU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:46:20 -0500 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17271.13688.298525.23645@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:45:44 +0300 To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Severe VFS Performance Issues 2.6 with > 95000 directory entries Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: <4376B787.9000108@soleranetworks.com> References: <4376B787.9000108@soleranetworks.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (patch 17) "chayote" (+CVS-20040321) XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 522 Lines: 19 Jeff V. Merkey writes: > > The subject line speaks for itself. This is using standard VFS readdir > and lookup calls through the VFSwith ftp. Very poor. Reiser4 works fine with 100M entries in a directory, so VFS is not a bottleneck here. [...] > > Jeff Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/