Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <5CE2F337.9060207@baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 20:34:31 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
CC:     khilman@baylibre.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ARM: meson: update with SPDX Licence identifier
References: <20190520143812.2801-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <CAFBinCCEi8OjeDaWxfhyfoQOu3GVsw=U9jBLQ2LEkPn7Ataf7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCCEi8OjeDaWxfhyfoQOu3GVsw=U9jBLQ2LEkPn7Ataf7w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Le 20/05/2019 20:06, Martin Blumenstingl a écrit :
> Hi Neil,
> 
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:38 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Update the SPDX Licence identifier for the Amlogic DT and mach-meson
>> files.
>>
>> Neil Armstrong (10):
>>   ARM: dts: meson: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson6-atv1200: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson6: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson8-minix-neo-x8: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson8: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson8b-mxq: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson8b-odroidc1: update with SPDX Licence identifier
>>   ARM: dts: meson8b: update with SPDX Licence identifier
> please check the .dts updates with my comment on the meson8b patch
> because I believe there are two typos (which managed to sneak into the
> rest of the patches)

You are right, thanks for pointing me to the licenses texts subtleties, I was misled by
the "of the GPL or the X11 license"... but looking closely clearly shows
a MIT license.

Will re-spin.

Neil

> 
> 
> Martin
>