Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 20 May 2019 16:52:14 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@marvell.com>,
        "apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add test for empty line after
 Fixes statement
Message-ID: <20190520135214.GM4573@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
References: <20190520124238.10298-1-michal.kalderon@marvell.com>
 <ed26df86d7d0e12263404842895460b1611def61.camel@perches.com>
 <MN2PR18MB318292E37F3AB9383D9FBE0FA1060@MN2PR18MB3182.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
 <60717bc4cdf327ffe671c328d47c315eefd385c8.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <60717bc4cdf327ffe671c328d47c315eefd385c8.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 06:34:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:16 +0000, Michal Kalderon wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 3:57 PM
> > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add test for empty line after Fixes
> > > statement
> > >
> > > External Email
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 15:42 +0300, Michal Kalderon wrote:
> > > > Check that there is no empty line after a fixes statement
> > >
> > > why?
> > >
> > This comment is given a lot on the netdev and rdma mailing lists when patches are submitted with
> > an empty line between Fixes: tag and SOB tags. Since "Fixes:" is just another tag and should be kept
> > together with the other ones.
>
> So test that all signature blocks and Fixes do not have
> blank lines between them instead of just the "Fixes:" line.
>
> And if there is some specific ordering required, perhaps a
> test for that ordering should be added as well.

I'm aware of only one request - Fixes above SOB.

Thanks

>