Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 07:16:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 07:16:48 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:55044 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 07:16:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Development Setups To: adam.keys@HOTARD.engr.smu.edu Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:22:24 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011005041759.OPDP14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> from "Adam Keys" at Oct 04, 2001 11:20:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I was thinking of starting with a modern machine for developing/compiling on, > and then older machine(s) for testing. This way I would not risk losing data That is how I work. One box editing/building and one testing. It also allows you to stare at dumps, oopses and things as well as the source at the same time. > Instead of having separate machines, there is the possibility of using the > Usermode port. As I understand it this lags behind the -ac and linus kernels > so it would be hard to test things like the new VM's. Usermode would not be Usermode Linux is merged with the -ac tree - it is great if you want to do non device driver hardware work. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/