Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751082AbVKNLXE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:23:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751084AbVKNLXE (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:23:04 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:19275 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbVKNLXB (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:23:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:24:03 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Pierre Ossman , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks Message-ID: <20051114112402.GT3699@suse.de> References: <20051114021127.GC5735@stusta.de> <4378650A.1070209@drzeus.cx> <1131964282.2821.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051114111108.GR3699@suse.de> <1131967167.2821.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1131967167.2821.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1617 Lines: 48 On Mon, Nov 14 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 12:11 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:20 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > It seems most problems with 4k stacks are already resolved. > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to see this patch to always use 4k stacks in -mm now for > > > > > finding any remaining problems before submitting this patch for 2.6.16. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has the block layer been remade to a serial approach? > > > > > > yes. > > > > Not in mainline it hasn't. > > well the patch was for -mm ;) ok :) > > > > Are there any recent benchmarks of 4kb vs 8kb stacks? > > not sure; I do know that it very much helps java (many more threads > possible) and the VM (far less order 1 allocs). In addition the 4Kb > allocation can be satisfied with the per cpu list of free 4Kb pages, > while obviously an order 1 cannot and has to go global. I realize it has nice advantages in theory, just wondering if anyone has done a performance analysis of 4kb vs 8kb stacks lately (or at all?). > > Is anyone shipping 4kb stack kernels? > > Both Fedora and RHEL are shipping this for all 2.6 based versions (eg > FC2 and all later, RHEL4) Cool, that's the kind of testing coverage I was hoping for. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/