Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1558146549.git.gneukum1@gmail.com> <20190520083026.GA13877@kroah.com>
 <CA+T6rvENoDXbUWEi4C5kXxsdamkZKVP19MwzEuxs0qC=ckMyeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+T6rvENoDXbUWEi4C5kXxsdamkZKVP19MwzEuxs0qC=ckMyeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Geordan Neukum <gneukum1@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 08:34:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+T6rvHrhTQLL_WCAPbj9nXngH2NCoW+kMXgGpGWB7+rLfYEOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Updates to staging driver: kpc_i2c
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:30:26AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> All now queued up.  I'll rebase my patches that move this file on top of
> yours, as kbuild found some problems with mine, and I'll resend them to
> the list.
>
> Thanks.

** Same content as last reply, just realized that I had configured my
** email client to do something wrong. Resend for readability's sake.

Additionally, I plan on trying to clean up that driver a bit more. Should I
base my future patches off of the staging tree so that I'll have the
"latest" driver as my basepoint? I don't want to cause any headaches
for anyone in the future.

Apologies, if I missed something obvious on the newbies wiki.
Assuming that I did not, I will certainly go ahead and try to document
this case either on or as a link from the "sending your first patch"
page.

Cheers,
Geordan