Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190508073331.27475-1-drinkcat@chromium.org> <CACRpkdZb73vNyepcfjzEGAopc7BBxde_N1wxn7PSJ3aGC0=Gig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZb73vNyepcfjzEGAopc7BBxde_N1wxn7PSJ3aGC0=Gig@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 03:13:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGp9LzriFJTf_pqUDx3Tmp2dbJBy7Rv1y73Tq+Rw5WeXPT94aA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: mediatek: mt8183: Add support for wake sources
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chuanjia Liu <Chuanjia.Liu@mediatek.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:56 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:33 AM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > This adds support for wake sources in pinctrl-mtk-common-v2, and
> > pinctrl-mt8183. Without this patch, all interrupts that are left
> > enabled on suspend act as wake sources (and wake sources without
> > interrupt enabled do not).
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> >  - Move changes from mtk-common-v2 to mtk-pinctrl-paris, as
> >    recommended by Sean, to keep better separation between eint
> >    and pinctrl-common features.
> >
> > Nicolas Boichat (2):
> >   pinctrl: mediatek: Add pm_ops to pinctrl-paris
> >   pinctrl: mediatek: mt8183: Add mtk_pinctrl_paris_pm_ops
>
> All seems to look fair to me, but I need some official ACK from
> Sean on these.
>

sure, it looks good to me and thanks for Nicolas' help

Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>

> I see there is some discussion on a related patch set which
> also has two patches so I am a but confused how mature the
> two patch sets are? Are they at all related?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij