Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 09:45:59 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] docs: Deal with some Sphinx deprecation
 warnings
Message-ID: <20190522094559.5ed8021e@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <39b12927-9bf9-a304-4108-8f471a204f89@darmarit.de>
References: <20190521211714.1395-1-corbet@lwn.net>
        <87d0kb7xf6.fsf@intel.com>
        <20190522071909.050bb227@coco.lan>
        <39b12927-9bf9-a304-4108-8f471a204f89@darmarit.de>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 22 May 2019 15:25:36 +0200
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> wrote:

> Lets use 1.7 :
> 
> - no need for Use_SSI wrapper
> - new log should work with 1.7 [1] --> no need for kernellog.py and
>    additional imports, instead include on top of python modules ::
> 
>      from sphinx.util import logging
>      logger = logging.getLogger('kerneldoc')

I think we're going to have to drag things forward at some point in the
not-too-distant future, but I think I'd rather not do that quite yet.  The
cost of supporting older sphinx for a few releases while we warn people is
not all that high.  So I think we should:

 - Put in (a future version of) my hacks for now, plus whatever else might
   be needed to make 2.0 work right.

 - Fix the fallout with regard to out-of-toctree .rst files so that we can
   actually build again with current sphinx.

 - Update Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt to ask for something a wee
   bit more recent than 1.4.9.

 - Add a warning when building with an older version that (say) 1.7 will
   be required as of (say) 5.5.

Does this make sense?

Thanks,

jon