Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 13:11:57 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Don't runtime suspend when device only
 supports wakeup from D0
Message-ID: <20190522181157.GC79339@google.com>
References: <20190521163104.15759-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
 <20190521222300.GG57618@google.com>
 <AE3B21D0-5BD9-40A5-B5A1-3E9A8B8E1327@canonical.com>
 <20190522134854.GA79339@google.com>
 <D5DC20F1-6B8F-466F-BAE7-65F0C8FB3D1D@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <D5DC20F1-6B8F-466F-BAE7-65F0C8FB3D1D@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:46:25PM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> > On May 22, 2019, at 9:48 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:42:14AM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> >> at 6:23 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:31:04AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> >>>> There's an xHC device that doesn't wake when a USB device gets plugged
> >>>> to its USB port. The driver's own runtime suspend callback was called,
> >>>> PME signaling was enabled, but it stays at PCI D0.

> > ...
> > And I guess this patch basically means we wouldn't call the driver's
> > suspend callback if we're merely going to stay at D0, so the driver
> > would have no idea anything happened.  That might match
> > Documentation/power/pci.txt better, because it suggests that the
> > suspend callback is related to putting a device in a low-power state,
> > and D0 is not a low-power state.
> 
> Yes, the patch is to let the device stay at D0 and don’t run driver’s own
> runtime suspend routine.
> 
> I guess I’ll just proceed to send a V2 with updated commit message?

Now that I understand what "runtime suspended to D0" means, help me
understand what's actually wrong.

The PCI core apparently *does* enable PME when we "suspend to D0".
But somehow calling the xHCI runtime suspend callback makes the driver
unable to notice when the PME is signaled?

Bjorn