Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2044:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n62csp1269501pjc; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:59:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxK3pYH9WESSIaPTd+ZOOJAfKQ4OpAUcnYqG5DBXTFNaEY4/1hscnkJkiJPnyt+9HFSKhXp X-Received: by 2002:a63:ee0b:: with SMTP id e11mr39755592pgi.453.1558555192982; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:59:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558555192; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iDCQIXgt77fCIP+AMsLtPUNd+UtVD6YMcEhuHIPLJiEA7zT+ylHMu/AoZ6FQMroPMa ewt/bxYBb6aoa07R9sg7QUsCYOUSYNekTtSMYmJhkhemx3P+xs58HrdbdMaUsgMZxcJ3 idWBQcjqhcu7eG9q8FYA2sdnD4he385+e6fKb47lEdsIwn9RWrRmsd0OmaHyAXqkV41J K0QJrpa51p5hyuQ1zu5HUspsM5H1J5uF+wnacOOPI0nS4o7s9jAkQuYRcnOQ3ed0+535 e4ZGEG1OHck0UhtVaIhHFU1OXGzDb0YQ2kII7/2MHXsRykMAUeF6CCzqmR5XhvofeK0P 2HUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Ti2gujd26XzQoLiTeDe8/05EiKdhekJsO0rEj6y07qw=; b=RufJhtb+VkWIrv8fu6BZsnMWrCWCGw6QeTAQeqplr0Xme0fil2JHe3bDoMNCkLtmqd B3W5/BFFmd6R4wHEWwvIWEcQfJUaF6+d2r1uA2aUYDs7WzYEJzK/xUcZrZGxHvThMcEd FWkrHHMNv2D7fyRVWucpjHxGTyN5n6ilzwV5x+cKzQQ4vEc90Oo5/MJdVbYQjeom60Ja OwrKFURKPMkpsqlkCzNPNSbqCVd1QWdkEBD8TzBb1tcwPi4Ygv2QIc8jNbv+SPEi0s/h /h7SQ80u+5bZJWEcOT2ZEHYHv5PiXYsUbNm1b9bGclG3EpItq3DKPYwD6Gf8nPcgVXcS phUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=YVVvBPJS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i1si25464686pgd.404.2019.05.22.12.59.37; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=YVVvBPJS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731970AbfEVT6K (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 May 2019 15:58:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:35684 "EHLO mail-pg1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730645AbfEVT6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 15:58:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id t1so1854404pgc.2 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:58:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ti2gujd26XzQoLiTeDe8/05EiKdhekJsO0rEj6y07qw=; b=YVVvBPJSZWF2y52mZXCQ82X6XtwoE27KpQxN2e1+7/BLzpnkKzo4WfwtQlpW4DxZXC Z67wKIzeAiyJA1pQH5QV2tdY2eDnlhXJfsKd3LGeC8QvCUp05Qk2VaQAwwV5omSmetaF okHRkhvoLrJ4mQhv0koADAwvUFNggZR4F8Fpk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ti2gujd26XzQoLiTeDe8/05EiKdhekJsO0rEj6y07qw=; b=dP70ReinqtFWEVUFSe+r4FR9r5Y4Ai376KGb6E1BjkjLUFgnyd5e29VGClNpkqrg43 vBmJg5yyBye2PSsoU+ozNxjRoEEFZ0nSqbnBAavThJeqmLYCewpYqKf59YFcvsUbYUo2 LPBhv+8asDkok+2Wildg6Rfau3L2WQp0a/j1SEqbCnXLYOLycRTtqzcW9QXUbdWP6sp6 5KXZ9SM9nyRywR1MDUK3CrbsOyRdH61+bp/8Rg/ARcDw49sCCImfcy8/L8YDHlmhZ20Q 2BKjOkWB8lF7Ov/hhaDrycK4kytlG4uX6yUO0TddIMP+Mn5mG3W/1vHYZJ/3Ddxe6LOw P0Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMwk1eMR2sGZB7xqQswssRFtSc2e5wpt0WuvSXHzRffPtdOJW9 qQCTmCYcYk5DyP1RuyunPScjoIBmYUdTmw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5c8c:: with SMTP id a12mr92237071pgt.452.1558555087658; Wed, 22 May 2019 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local (192-0-228-88.cpe.teksavvy.com. [192.0.228.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm24742643pgv.15.2019.05.22.12.58.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 May 2019 12:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 15:58:04 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PSA: Do not use "Reported-By" without reporter's approval Message-ID: <20190522195804.GC21412@chatter.i7.local> References: <20190522193011.GB21412@chatter.i7.local> <7b7287463e830fa8d981dc440f8165622cbc628e.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7b7287463e830fa8d981dc440f8165622cbc628e.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> It is common courtesy to include this tagline when submitting >> patches: >> >> Reported-By: J. Doe >> >> Please ask the reporter's permission before doing so (even if they'd >> submitted a public bugzilla report or sent a report to the mailing >> list). > >I disagree with this. > >If the report is public, and lists like vger are public, >then using a Reported-by: and/or a Link: are simply useful >history and tracking information. I'm perfectly fine with Link:, however Reported-By: usually has the person's name and email address (i.e. PII data per GDPR definition). If that person submitted the bug report via bugzilla.kernel.org or a similar resource, their expectation is that they can delete their account should they choose to to do so. However, if the patch containing Reported-By is committed to git, their PII becomes permanently and immutably recorded for any reasonable meaning of the word "forever." Now, I'm pretty sure that a request to rebase git history to edit a commit message would be considered "unreasonable" under GDPR provisions, but a) it still eats up valuable time handling such requests and b) it's a consequence reporters are not aware of when they submit bug reports. So, my request to ask for permission before using "Reported-By" is not coming from any legal position, but from the perspective of courtesy to people submitting those reports. -K