Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 20:57:37 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@mellanox.com>,
        Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
        Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Use HMM for ODP v4
Message-ID: <20190522235737.GD15389@ziepe.ca>
References: <20190411181314.19465-1-jglisse@redhat.com>
 <20190506195657.GA30261@ziepe.ca>
 <20190521205321.GC3331@redhat.com>
 <20190522005225.GA30819@ziepe.ca>
 <20190522174852.GA23038@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190522174852.GA23038@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:48:52PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:

> > > So attached is a rebase on top of 5.2-rc1, i have tested with pingpong
> > > (prefetch and not and different sizes). Seems to work ok.
> > 
> > Urk, it already doesn't apply to the rdma tree :(
> > 
> > The conflicts are a little more extensive than I'd prefer to handle..
> > Can I ask you to rebase it on top of this branch please:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/log/?h=wip/jgg-for-next
> > 
> > Specifically it conflicts with this patch:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=wip/jgg-for-next&id=d2183c6f1958e6b6dfdde279f4cee04280710e34

There is at least one more serious blocker here:

config ARCH_HAS_HMM_MIRROR
        bool
        default y
        depends on (X86_64 || PPC64)
        depends on MMU && 64BIT

I can't loose ARM64 support for ODP by merging this, that is too
serious of a regression.

Can you fix it?

Thanks,
Jason