Received: by 2002:a25:86ce:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y14csp1567731ybm; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:18:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwpxiFhC+k1uGx00FCn6qO/BS/rQYPSzPb7AYHbeZsruXstUoh3s2ZLr09Nj+dAWnt9eol X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a27:: with SMTP id o36mr417011pjo.95.1558606683222; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:18:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558606683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=otjTTaBzF1s2m/7nN0Y0+nID6emqwKy0gDxA25dPGhBhrHM4Ftovq7wseR9gPKNXPc cDiAAFvNRBKTsTXa2gC8ihE7ppMs8BFEdFjigdnwV4pTZgpJl6pxH+YmBl2O4eBDhS4R 0Ys3LKvHsohqzCewIkhnH+6XFof/51tb91x5CHN4hN0CbO0hFdSv2socncApVkmMPGNA 0WdDu64RiJ76G2H/htOKRFr00wQ/pME9zIKRl8m68W1OjBOtTrfgDcOIG6YF97Ut/wg1 pNK6sBNHUlYwHwnteY8BMrsXN5p1pX1H2fKROP2CIJzSGzCqRgeYzisZfVbwxdhfZL4C /qTQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=n6fhQR2xxjD7pVKk2myu9Npt4nnr6J8q5OhDOkJ71ng=; b=CX8g6YCod/GKrK4LqU9JyRBUOoEQGZFnviU6XM9FIM7P2wbu7bsO4J5qRWRqyEvjVt gdlrCSFrXGbX/ICkoGHW2+N9p4esQs1JYQE41UIc7IpyJiSRsbfnabCT3CDRuwbacmv0 0BX+UpFi7sQY4TjvsQ30u12zPuBCE46YKuitAoqfLmleVSyUMjZSZ1qpkeV4zJpb9R2j 0Yg9eanbHfCB4Z7nh1DYu5kFaCbpPen/ss37xm3BEe46I/J1Nc5dTLz+Q5NeWVTmarkY sveW+rqLIkKX8yatVJq5nN/6OTcRNMA47lZwxfZIymK66ft7LyxxJUCfNdfKFF6BTbev htMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h4si28770961pgm.571.2019.05.23.03.17.47; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730331AbfEWKQU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:16:20 -0400 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:3965 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726846AbfEWKQT (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:16:19 -0400 X-UUID: 68eeb74a4e9d4da5a998aed5323fa1a2-20190523 X-UUID: 68eeb74a4e9d4da5a998aed5323fa1a2-20190523 Received: from mtkcas34.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 841437274; Thu, 23 May 2019 18:16:13 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 23 May 2019 18:16:11 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 May 2019 18:16:10 +0800 Message-ID: <1558606570.10179.403.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by node From: Chunfeng Yun To: Heikki Krogerus CC: Biju Das , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , "Adam Thomson" , Li Jun , Badhri Jagan Sridharan , Hans de Goede , Andy Shevchenko , Min Guo , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:16:10 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20190522142640.GN1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20190517130511.GA1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> <1558319951.10179.352.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20190520080359.GC1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20190520083601.GE1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20190521095839.GI1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> <1558517436.10179.388.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20190522142640.GN1887@kuha.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-1DBptkwq7PrdOe2/R7LH" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-1DBptkwq7PrdOe2/R7LH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Heikki, On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 17:26 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:55:17AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > Hi Chunfeng Yun, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by > > > node > > > > > > Hi Biju, > > > On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 08:05 +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > > > Hi Heikki, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get > > > > > usb_role_switch by node > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:45:46AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Heikki, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get > > > > > > > usb_role_switch by node > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:06:41AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Heikki, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get > > > > > > > > > usb_role_switch by node > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:39:11AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 16:05 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:37:36PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:47:21PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() to make easier to > > > > > > > > > > > > > get usb_role_switch by fwnode which register it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's useful when there is not device_connection > > > > > > > > > > > > > registered between two drivers and only knows the > > > > > > > > > > > > > fwnode which register usb_role_switch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Biju Das > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hold on. I just noticed Rob's comment on patch 2/6, > > > > > > > > > > > where he points out that you don't need to use device > > > > > > > > > > > graph since the controller is the parent of the > > > > > > > > > > > connector. Doesn't that mean you don't really need this API? > > > > > > > > > > No, I still need it. > > > > > > > > > > The change is about the way how to get fwnode; when use > > > > > > > > > > device graph, get fwnode by of_graph_get_remote_node(); > > > > > > > > > > but now will get fwnode by of_get_parent(); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I get that, but I'm still not convinced about if > > > > > > > > > something like this function is needed at all. I also have > > > > > > > > > concerns regarding how you are using the function. I'll > > > > > > > > > explain in comment to the patch 5/6 in this > > > > > > > series... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI, Currently I am also using this api in my patch series. > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944637/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and I have the same question for you I jusb asked in > > > > > > > comment I added to the patch 5/6 of this series. Why isn't > > > > > > > usb_role_switch_get() > > > > > enough? > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently no issue. It will work with this api as well, since the > > > > > > port node is > > > > > part of controller node. > > > > > > For eg:- > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944627/ > > > > > > > > > > > > However if any one adds port node inside the connector node, then > > > > > > this > > > > > api may won't work as expected. > > > > > > Currently I get below error > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 2.299703] OF: graph: no port node found in > > > > > /soc/i2c@e6500000/hd3ss3220@47 > > > > > > > > > > We need to understand why is that happening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Form the stack trace the parent node is "parent_node=hd3ss3220@47" , > > > instead of the "connector" node. > > > > That is the reason for the above error. > > > > > > > > [ 2.442429] of_graph_get_next_endpoint.part.0+0x28/0x168 > > > > [ 2.447889] of_fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x5c/0xb0 > > > > [ 2.453267] fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x20/0x30 > > > > [ 2.458374] device_connection_find_match+0x74/0x1a0 > > > > [ 2.463399] usb_role_switch_get+0x20/0x28 > > > > [ 2.467542] hd3ss3220_probe+0xc4/0x218 > > > > > > > > The use case is > > > > > > > > &i2c0 { > > > > hd3ss3220@47 { > > > > compatible = "ti,hd3ss3220"; > > > > > > > > usb_con: connector { > > > > compatible = "usb-c-connector"; > > > > port { > > > > hd3ss3220_ep: endpoint { > > > > remote-endpoint = > > > <&usb3_role_switch>; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > &usb3_peri0 { > > > > companion = <&xhci0>; > > > > usb-role-switch; > > > > > > > > port { > > > > usb3_role_switch: endpoint { > > > > remote-endpoint = <&hd3ss3220_ep>; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > Q1) How do we modify the usb_role_switch_get() function to search > > > > Child(connector) and child's endpoint? > > > How about firstly finding connector node in fwnode_graph_devcon_match(), > > > then search each endpoint? > > > > I have done a quick prototyping with the changes you suggested and it works. > > > > - struct fwnode_handle *ep; > > + struct fwnode_handle *ep,*child,*tmp = fwnode; > > > > - fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, ep) { > > + child = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "connector"); > > + if (child) > > + tmp = child; > > + > > + fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(tmp, ep) { > > > > Form the stack trace the parent node is "parent_node= connector" . > > > > [ 2.440922] of_graph_get_next_endpoint.part.0+0x28/0x168 > > [ 2.446381] of_fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x5c/0xb0 > > [ 2.451758] fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x20/0x30 > > [ 2.456866] device_connection_find_match+0x84/0x1c0 > > [ 2.461888] usb_role_switch_get+0x20/0x28 > > > > Heikki, > > Are you ok with the above changes? > > Doesn't that mean that if we made fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() the way > I proposed, there is no problem? You just find the "connector" child > node in your driver, and pass that to fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(): > > struct fwnode_handle *connector; > ... > connector = device_get_named_child_node(&client->dev, "connector"); > if (IS_ERR(connector)) > > > hd3ss3220->role_sw = fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(connector); > ... > > The difference is that instead of just converting a device node of an > usb role switch to the usb role switch, it works just like > usb_role_switch_get(), just taking fwnode instead of device entry as > parameter. > > I prepared the patches implementing fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() the > way I though it needs to work for my own tests. Please find the > patches attached. I tested these patches, it didn't work for case as following: case 2: &mtu3 { usb-role-switch; connector { compatible = "linux,typeb-conn-gpio", "usb-b-connector"; label = "micro-USB"; type = "micro"; id-gpios = <&pio 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; vbus-supply = <&usb_p0_vbus>; }; }; so I consider this case in the function fwnode_graph_devcon_match() (based on your patches) diff --git a/drivers/base/devcon.c b/drivers/base/devcon.c index 8311b70..1dae8b7 100644 --- a/drivers/base/devcon.c +++ b/drivers/base/devcon.c @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ { struct device_connection con = { .id = con_id }; struct fwnode_handle *ep; + int ep_count = 0; void *ret; fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, ep) { + ep_count++; con.fwnode = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep); if (!fwnode_device_is_available(con.fwnode)) continue; @@ -32,6 +34,19 @@ return ret; } } + + /* if the connector has no remote endpoint, check its parent */ + if (!ep_count) { + con.fwnode = fwnode_get_parent(fwnode); + if (!con.fwnode) + return NULL; + + ret = match(&con, -1, data); + fwnode_handle_put(con.fwnode); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + return NULL; } see attached patch. then both usb_role_switch_get(dev) or fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(fwnode) work well; but I don't know which way is better when consider this specific case, put into class.c as you suggested before or put into devcon.c like above. Thanks a lot > > thanks, > --=-1DBptkwq7PrdOe2/R7LH Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-device-connection-test-only.patch" Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-device-connection-test-only.patch"; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From bd291df4d0247fce5c11da746ae0761420054cf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chunfeng Yun Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:04:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] device connection: test only Change-Id: Ie1b4b6304dfd7a89516fa3578aa5a5b1be924212 Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun --- drivers/base/devcon.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/devcon.c b/drivers/base/devcon.c index 8311b70bbca2..1dae8b77562d 100644 --- a/drivers/base/devcon.c +++ b/drivers/base/devcon.c @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ fwnode_graph_devcon_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *con_id, { struct device_connection con = { .id = con_id }; struct fwnode_handle *ep; + int ep_count = 0; void *ret; fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, ep) { + ep_count++; con.fwnode = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep); if (!fwnode_device_is_available(con.fwnode)) continue; @@ -32,6 +34,19 @@ fwnode_graph_devcon_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *con_id, return ret; } } + + /* if the connector has no remote endpoint, check its parent */ + if (!ep_count) { + con.fwnode = fwnode_get_parent(fwnode); + if (!con.fwnode) + return NULL; + + ret = match(&con, -1, data); + fwnode_handle_put(con.fwnode); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + return NULL; } -- 2.21.0 --=-1DBptkwq7PrdOe2/R7LH--