Received: by 2002:a25:86ce:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y14csp1589558ybm; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwWOoVvis1Yq0FtnYOjI/LPU2lMVNiI0CUXz3PjrCb8/jGa3MvQ60Ez9j6Z/bfzLwwo/Lng X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:112b:: with SMTP id d40mr94529858pla.31.1558608170814; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558608170; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rvM1cFlzJ1tf8PnnB0YpgsKvSyLMGB2UueuJPVG/13rIuBvQQjSflMkbcyZX42lMvW JC/+vOoYSoJs8HCw4Hi1X35ZGiHTitNDqYeih3BUjpW5k5b7zgQu3Rf+6Ig6+umiQCOa w5mOxcx7gttT1RRlQwXHzy1oE1GbYjpvMpc27YsNuE3EIzT1rO0zlPBVDt6+Qq4AWny1 5E5ktz3agLD+D3ce6h9N0o5mRquK3pEehPaolEwlX97E8dbAqSnSpxD8mS5k2M2QW1/n LKnkb1YoEmBR6xO8UVyp9VA8zoVbooJlftCzbNMeO/J+bhuXV5f/GDHjSMIt6biadpZK FWPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=TaU6KLsZvStH9/fEF27W1ft4y2rNSsXirQNit4Xc8ac=; b=euabzmlc2sW1/i/niD0Hjhfgqg02YQhoEaz42+ekoGCuP+ApvFxReuGnfGpa5AiT9v lfaMvXQSahJxcCRVr0J3/Inr0TjwDYqZkaqStdU0+XygNZSxCRhnd4wLdjnWOM9eENmc PlZo9UbezwNj/jp4VPN4U1Tp2rIRvLiBHNsbSZvaApktX8JP7HdVNljeak8doHAzZPxF bjCHjyqXyckQ8nN6u/6bbqSgClRu4JFKDGl3eBmufMacIqpd7rUMy+vRVKm4PVs5Q227 B0xFHiCx594ubzUYvpqUZz+JJN1SknX4FbHVP1OHRN2S2Y4Fy2fFAoiS8UW2gP0ewZpk omhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 97si3866564plb.62.2019.05.23.03.42.35; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729972AbfEWKlJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:41:09 -0400 Received: from smtp2.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.81]:56381 "EHLO smtp2.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727434AbfEWKlJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:41:09 -0400 Received: from ghe-pc.suse.asia (prva10-snat226-2.provo.novell.com [137.65.226.36]) by smtp2.provo.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Thu, 23 May 2019 04:40:58 -0600 From: Gang He To: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, jiangqi903@gmail.com Cc: Gang He , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: add last unlock times in locking_state Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:40:46 +0800 Message-Id: <20190523104047.14794-1-ghe@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ocfs2 file system uses locking_state file under debugfs to dump each ocfs2 file system's dlm lock resources, but the dlm lock resources in memory are becoming more and more after the files were touched by the user. it will become a bit difficult to analyze these dlm lock resource records in locking_state file by the upper scripts, though some files are not active for now, which were accessed long time ago. Then, I'd like to add last pr/ex unlock times in locking_state file for each dlm lock resource record, the the upper scripts can use last unlock time to filter inactive dlm lock resource record. Signed-off-by: Gang He Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi --- fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c index af405586c5b1..dccf4136f8c1 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw, int ret) { u32 usec; - ktime_t kt; + ktime_t last, kt; struct ocfs2_lock_stats *stats; if (level == LKM_PRMODE) @@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, else return; - kt = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), mw->mw_lock_start); + last = ktime_get(); + kt = ktime_sub(last, mw->mw_lock_start); usec = ktime_to_us(kt); stats->ls_gets++; @@ -474,6 +475,8 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, if (ret) stats->ls_fail++; + + stats->ls_last = ktime_to_timespec(last).tv_sec; } static inline void ocfs2_track_lock_refresh(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres) @@ -3093,8 +3096,10 @@ static void *ocfs2_dlm_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) * - Lock stats printed * New in version 3 * - Max time in lock stats is in usecs (instead of nsecs) + * New in version 4 + * - Add last pr/ex unlock times in secs */ -#define OCFS2_DLM_DEBUG_STR_VERSION 3 +#define OCFS2_DLM_DEBUG_STR_VERSION 4 static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { int i; @@ -3145,6 +3150,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) # define lock_max_prmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_prmode.ls_max) # define lock_max_exmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_exmode.ls_max) # define lock_refresh(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_refresh) +# define lock_last_prmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_prmode.ls_last) +# define lock_last_exmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_exmode.ls_last) #else # define lock_num_prmode(_l) (0) # define lock_num_exmode(_l) (0) @@ -3155,6 +3162,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) # define lock_max_prmode(_l) (0) # define lock_max_exmode(_l) (0) # define lock_refresh(_l) (0) +# define lock_last_prmode(_l) (0) +# define lock_last_exmode(_l) (0) #endif /* The following seq_print was added in version 2 of this output */ seq_printf(m, "%u\t" @@ -3165,6 +3174,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) "%llu\t" "%u\t" "%u\t" + "%u\t" + "%u\t" "%u\t", lock_num_prmode(lockres), lock_num_exmode(lockres), @@ -3174,7 +3185,9 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) lock_total_exmode(lockres), lock_max_prmode(lockres), lock_max_exmode(lockres), - lock_refresh(lockres)); + lock_refresh(lockres), + lock_last_prmode(lockres), + lock_last_exmode(lockres)); /* End the line */ seq_printf(m, "\n"); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h index 1f029fbe8b8d..8efa022684f4 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct ocfs2_lock_stats { /* Storing max wait in usecs saves 24 bytes per inode */ u32 ls_max; /* Max wait in USEC */ + u32 ls_last; /* Last unlock time in SEC */ }; #endif -- 2.21.0