Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751436AbVKOOsa (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:48:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932514AbVKOOs3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:48:29 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:54419 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751436AbVKOOs3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:48:29 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:15:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com References: <20051110090920.8083.54147.sendpatchset@cherry.local> <200511110516.37980.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511151515.05201.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 19 On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:34, Magnus Damm wrote: > > My plan with breaking out the NUMA emulation code was to merge my i386 > stuff with the x86_64 code, but as you say - it might be overkill. > > What do you think about the fact that real NUMA nodes now can be > divided into several smaller nodes? Is it really needed? I never needed it. Normally numa emulation is just for basic numa testing, and for that just an independent split is good enough. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/