Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751472AbVKORrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:47:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751470AbVKORrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:47:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:26272 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467AbVKORrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:47:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:33:07 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development Message-ID: <20051115173307.GB13707@suse.de> References: <20051114220709.GA5234@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1947 Lines: 48 On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:42:44PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > The kernel is written using GNU C and the GNU toolchain. While it > > adheres to the ISO C99 (??) standard, it uses a number of extensions > > C89 - The few left over gcc 2.95 users are blocking modern C constructs. > Even without that it would be a C99 subset, e.g. arbitary long long divisions > or floating point are not supported. > > Also the kernel is a freestanding C environment, so parts are not supported. Thanks, I've modified it to mention this. > > Also realize that it is not acceptable to send patches for inclusion > > that are unfinished and will be "fixed up later." > > I'm not sure I fully agree on that. I conflicts with the "merge early, merge > often" imperative. IMHO it's ok to submit patches that are not perfect, > but improve something or make a incremental cleanup step, as long as the > problems are not severe and the patch by itself is a clear improvement. Of course > this is handled on a case by case basis. Yeah, it is a case-by-case, but generally we want to know up front what the final result is going to be. > > Justify your change > > ------------------- > > > > Along with breaking up your patches, it is very important for you to let > > the Linux community know why they should add this change. New features > > must be justified as being needed and useful. > > My request is that each patch should carry a meaningful changelog. > That should tell why and a rough (doesn't need to be detailed) overview how > the change is done. Others privately commented on this too, and I've added a section describing it. Thanks for the comments. greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/