Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp560393ybi; Fri, 24 May 2019 07:58:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHvs62iBPyszGVfgcI0j/cakaDgJIt92HBWNl12QtYiwkSWNztUTCtxNLObEwbX4ND8NRC X-Received: by 2002:a65:51cb:: with SMTP id i11mr15564832pgq.390.1558709927057; Fri, 24 May 2019 07:58:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558709927; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ld37YZ0hVRwObKpiNhgtNx8RPmkOrFm77PqWqO0ldGbAzM+g8u7d1NEjJQjeKfOfGJ IhemHFMVrsuv6ijmOrO7fqBZJkBOLkDFiS3xXrnVtf8lw5IZdeZlmqhl7fQDqnyLROLY bz4gDCdEtULwOGn7Gn4WhmWnR5CgANE5JVeqx8S12FjDZ8OE/firS9r2MROQttK6gGc5 l71eoKB3zxGPQzkcToGNsSkr/JzhmFY4U50q7l1b2n+UYoDLbRq8i+SlYhvIHXeOqvHf cHxqhqFAuc5arGzqgOkmMq5tH9UE6ZIxv+LOnO30CrAXmqks3PVcGrWyge3z2KkSKgsE wJ3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=Y4nCMIBx4EDoP1Kl/F5n3N12YbKUOZkTP/X11UkINzo=; b=HCzDNEFRo4vCQblp/34R1OkSDi2hCjLg+FiQD6zGZtEuySiO6rKVnt/C6YQtfZF58I LEmaWdgWW5G2AHZr4NLd6ngeEhHAM3Bq16ma4SSChr9HpYcCRuPWlRA2E+skd1W7JEww f2GX2SiHUpUI7ps9XtqLjrdzfSau03qNJeg/iOD9BxRbS/GPwdm1vxEK0Y9W9p5rsDE8 KYZ+y+VS3x/VZxtjE0h6HIKGX4yYrHuFIoMUdoMSgXJHoStiAqasOWFj8xmDAGWmgR1z CpNl7J9y5+9axez17hk74g0bGMPrquvoF8EZ98qjUeF0l4fyU7uT+2cF6b8AortiGI3C ENQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x14si4027396pjq.94.2019.05.24.07.58.29; Fri, 24 May 2019 07:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404136AbfEXO5Q (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 May 2019 10:57:16 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:37312 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2403917AbfEXO5Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 10:57:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4OEkvGN135185 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:57:14 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2spfj7a9jr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 10:57:14 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 24 May 2019 15:57:12 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 24 May 2019 15:57:08 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4OEv76r22478954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 May 2019 14:57:07 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D842041; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:57:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B1C42047; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:57:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.111.39]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:57:06 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] Add a new ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline to measure cmdline args From: Mimi Zohar To: Prakhar Srivastava , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mjg59@google.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, vgoyal@redhat.com Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:56:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190521000645.16227-2-prsriva02@gmail.com> References: <20190521000645.16227-1-prsriva02@gmail.com> <20190521000645.16227-2-prsriva02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052414-0016-0000-0000-0000027F1275 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052414-0017-0000-0000-000032DC0F9A Message-Id: <1558709815.3977.56.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-24_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905240099 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Prakhar, On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 17:06 -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > Currently during kexec_file_load(soft reboot) the cmdline args > passed are not measured and the PCR values are not reset. This patch addresses not measuring the kexec boot cmdline.  I don't see a reason for mentioning anything about the PCR values not being reset.  Keep it simple. > This results in the new kernel to assume a secure boot was > followed. The boot args used to launch the new kernel need to be > measured and carried over to the next kernel to be used for > attestation. IMA supports only measuring files, no functionality > exists to measure a buffer(kexec cmdline). > > This change adds a new functionality to measure buffers > process_buffer_measurement which uses the hash of the buffer > instead of file hash to add an entry in the ima log. > A new ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline is also defined which calls > into process_buffer_measurement to add the kexec_cmdline args > to the log. > > A new policy KEXEC_CMDLINE is also defined to control measuring the > kexec_cmdline buffer. > This patch only adds IMA_MEASURE as a supported functionality. > > - A new ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline is defined to be called by the > kexec code. > - A new function process_buffer_measurement is defined to measure > the buffer hash into the ima log. > - A new func policy KEXEC_CMDLINE is defined to control the measurement. Missing is how to verify the digest of the measurement list kexec boot cmdline entry based on /proc/cmdline.  Everything before the "root=" in the /proc entry needs to be removed before calculating the hash.  Please include a sample shell command. Matthew's patch "IMA: Allow profiles to define the desired IMA template" will require changes to this patch.  Please rebase this patch set on top of it, once Matthew addresses the comments and re- posts. (Reminder: the patch description should be 70 - 75 characters.) > > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava > --- < snip > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -576,6 +576,83 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id) > return 0; > } > > +/* > + * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log. > + * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log. > + * @size: size of buffer(in bytes). > + * @eventname: event name to be used for the buffer entry. > + * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation. > + * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated. > + * > + * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log. > + */ > +static void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, > + const char *eventname, const struct cred *cred, > + u32 secid) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + struct ima_template_entry *entry = NULL; > + struct integrity_iint_cache tmp_iint, *iint = &tmp_iint; > + struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, NULL, NULL, > + NULL, 0, NULL}; Thiago's clean up patch initializes only specific variables, as needed.  Please initialize event_data like: struct ima_event_data event_data = {.iint = iint}; > + struct { > + struct ima_digest_data hdr; > + char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; > + } hash; > + int violation = 0; > + int pcr = CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX; > + int action = 0; > + > + action = ima_get_action(NULL, cred, secid, 0, KEXEC_CMDLINE, &pcr); > + if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) > + goto out; > + > + memset(iint, 0, sizeof(*iint)); > + memset(&hash, 0, sizeof(hash)); > + > + event_data.filename = eventname; > + > + iint->ima_hash = &hash.hdr; > + iint->ima_hash->algo = ima_hash_algo; > + iint->ima_hash->length = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo]; > + > + ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(buf, size, iint->ima_hash); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto out; > + > + ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto out; > + > + if (action & IMA_MEASURE) > + ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr); > + > + if (ret < 0) { > + ima_free_template_entry(entry); > + } Remove brackets. Mimi > + > +out: > + return; > +}