Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        hexdump0815@googlemail.com,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ARM: meson8b-mxq: better support for the TRONFY MXQ
In-Reply-To: <20190524181936.29470-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
References: <20190524181936.29470-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 12:42:13 -0700
Message-ID: <7hblzr1vxm.fsf@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> A while ago a user asked on #linux-amlogic about the state of the
> TRONFY MXQ in mainline. I did some research (mainly downloading an
> Android firmware image for that device and looking at the .dtb) and
> updated the mainline .dts accordingly.
>
> I kept this patch in my tree but didn't hear back from anyone with one
> of these boards (who could actually test my patch). That was until
> today where I got the following message on IRC:
>   any plans to submit your latest own version of the meson8b mxq dtb
>   to mainline? it works really well for me and the one in mainline is
>   too simple to be usedful ...

Any chance of getting a Tested-by: from that IRC user on the patch?

Kevin