Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190505020328.165839-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20190507000453.GB3923@linux.ibm.com> <20190508162635.GD187505@google.com> <20190508181638.GY3923@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190508181638.GY3923@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 13:07:12 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YR69RRNZfkfFyvprs5+VKBGu29h0_-gnQmuNhN54+ReHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/rcu: Correct field_count field naming in examples
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:16 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > > And this example code predates v2.6.12.  ;-)
> > >
> > > So good eyes, but I believe that this really does reflect the ancient
> > > code...
> > >
> > > On the other hand, would you have ideas for more modern replacement
> > > examples?
> >
> > There are 3 cases I can see in listRCU.txt:
> >   (1) action taken outside of read_lock (can tolerate stale data), no in-place update.
> >                 this is the best possible usage of RCU.
> >   (2) action taken outside of read_lock, in-place updates
> >                 this is good as long as not too many in-place updates.
> >                 involves copying creating new list node and replacing the
> >                 node being updated with it.
> >   (3) cannot tolerate stale data: here a deleted or obsolete flag can be used
> >                                   protected by a per-entry lock. reader
> >                                 aborts if object is stale.
> >
> > Any replacement example must make satisfy (3) too?
>
> It would be OK to have a separate example for (3).  It would of course
> be nicer to have one example for all three, but not all -that- important.
>
> > The only example for (3) that I know of is sysvipc sempahores which you also
> > mentioned in the paper. Looking through this code, it hasn't changed
> > conceptually and it could be a fit for an example (ipc_valid_object() checks
> > for whether the object is stale).
>
> That is indeed the classic canonical example.  ;-)

FWIW just want to mention, it seems to me the ptrace task list
traversal could be a great example of "mark obsolete objects" and is
simple so I could just use that.
Neil talks about it in his article here:
https://lwn.net/Articles/610972/ . In "Group 3: Transform the way the
list is walked"

Cheers,
- Joel