Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3479235ybi; Mon, 27 May 2019 00:25:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzCsCwwCvyGSD0iJhOSyfLND31FoofjKf02vvx1xAiwvgBNsdH3j/m+X71+GFSdlF0w7kn X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7146:: with SMTP id g6mr28987291pjs.45.1558941918563; Mon, 27 May 2019 00:25:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558941918; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Mm0NWfHkKxKdMjxK+p6oVEWg6JFqyO1UbyMdYaqTFkZRGPMFJTPc5WoBSRfGyRl5pZ uM6X2+dCLUXE+gWxresAk8ZZBUxJj5njQcanVfL0TBmGr6ZqWYiA1pxCu4cJKmCmuh49 AXGWZhiJQWJwaZWvJF9mg+3jPPd7eq/9PIHNHX6ZJRVmfvxx+guCFcD9wr6iS2/TUnIs NvAMOb0J7tdG67Sfs2l0dXUSJz6ieCijnUwju9JvBndYiJsXNb/D29R7OPuBlPPcqWiY JTImyxxcZ34DPFfJJWWtQRZfHkc3n/NGChLRkhs039lAxve/75Lt+Ddy3qi6XNhr/Vj9 kr2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:to :from:date:dkim-signature; bh=2XlwtdTDcuaDorSI4XGu8GOVlB9xVJLmN3a76Z7B/Bg=; b=d7Q/Z7Z0vIVKOMzqIFbIDqTeypGbzWIe5d3kxInFSQbNUs/GSxVcBf1hoyn+a6fL7a bh3Ngd+GCnQUzj0gUI/vRzv4r7dt+c6UcIuJnkNREXj04ugwYOIZgEA4u8RLSaEgt03W 4NOdVuc3IAyrZl9EmrUYm+XWePdxef6iEnJ1rH2GP9eS+I5EqoJMJ+DlHx96AWQV/FvQ znZv5ZnDjgVxWPeZFtlxilm1zDwih0QaHyKWrV1UzvWlQYG9MSgqMyXuKp5P/4vv0yyu FrQ8x0gPPE7aj2kuS55rLvWBTTj+k4MtB9xmUrp9Z5jirplZluPq+py2RsELB0HHduhN GGPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ceREux1Q; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n88si16592132pjc.7.2019.05.27.00.25.03; Mon, 27 May 2019 00:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ceREux1Q; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726381AbfE0HWs (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 May 2019 03:22:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60876 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725869AbfE0HWs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2019 03:22:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [84.241.203.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEB4C21721; Mon, 27 May 2019 07:22:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1558941767; bh=1cA0cnInqvTzulrpX7d6hXfocOLgpBBrZG8Ny9ZxLfk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ceREux1QwTsso3dG4v3GF5RI6RERXGAx5Pkm03bCgLmj01YUcOYonXcmpkIeVTfw3 tDtqyFmhoJoX1Nfm6GyRLl/bcYPP3pYUtr8lxGIjz4x5hi8x2nwzGEaCdGKbirpqf1 icAfoPLCCpNRl/tP4xPiiB4c+OwZ4V+xOikYIHbc= Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:22:43 +0200 From: Greg KH To: LKML , Intel Graphics Development , DRI Development , Jens Frederich , Daniel Drake , Jon Nettleton Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/33] staging/olpc: lock_fb_info can't fail Message-ID: <20190527072243.GC7997@kroah.com> References: <20190524085354.27411-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20190524085354.27411-15-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20190527071010.GK21222@phenom.ffwll.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527071010.GK21222@phenom.ffwll.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Simply because olpc never unregisters the damn thing. It also > > registers the framebuffer directly by poking around in fbdev > > core internals, so it's all around rather broken. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > Cc: Jens Frederich > > Cc: Daniel Drake > > Cc: Jon Nettleton > > Hi Greg, > > Somehow get_maintainers didn't pick you up for this. Ack for merging this > through drm/fbdev? It's part of a bigger series to rework fbdev/fbcon > interactions. Again, all good for you to take: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman