Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965091AbVKOX40 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:56:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965092AbVKOX40 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:56:26 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]:50608 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965091AbVKOX40 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:56:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051116004111.45f3f704.grundig@teleline.es> References: <20051116004111.45f3f704.grundig@teleline.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Bernd Petrovitsch , linux-kernel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Parag Warudkar Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:56:17 -0500 To: "Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:41:11 +0100" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 761 Lines: 25 On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:41 PM, Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:41:11 +0100 wrote: > >> documentation for broadcom wireless: >> http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/ >> embrionic driver based on this spec: >> http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ > > > Maybe a good deal would be to delay the 4K patch until some > preliminary > version of those is merged? Andi had some pretty valid comments against the 4K approach. Here - http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/6/4 I didn't see anyone contradicting his opinion. Seems very plausible to me. Parag - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/