Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965148AbVKPBKZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:10:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965147AbVKPBKY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:10:24 -0500 Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:32779 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965145AbVKPBKX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:10:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:10:57 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20051116.101057.23968406.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: vladislav.yasevich@hp.com Cc: yanzheng@21cn.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]small fix for __ipv6_addr_type(...) From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <437A5F42.3080100@hp.com> References: <4376F2CE.4050003@21cn.com> <437A5F42.3080100@hp.com> Organization: USAGI/WIDE Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 534 Lines: 13 In article <437A5F42.3080100@hp.com> (at Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:20:50 -0500), Vlad Yasevich says: > No, according to RFC 4007, loopback is considered a link-local > address. Agreed. RFC3484 also explicitly says that loopback is treated as link-local. --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/