Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3767452ybi; Mon, 27 May 2019 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrGwnLClUQw4Qnfjp/8kE5nSRU5F5ZaHG+BgyBVOMCElBhnunUd0JzesRpg6cP0PKBnra7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b184:: with SMTP id s4mr89993845plr.46.1558961139299; Mon, 27 May 2019 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558961139; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TJ6NxLAArq0li7nZlOrFEtRQ1tg+sSa+nrmQxIU4PhEj684PSn2b+U2IOIZrzlVYyX FAZnl6wi3twk9Xd/Pl8dOQMEq+A0VuKBjAV0gPupYYhUK+vAtK358egExR14aqgijCno ewbAmlNDBt0AU7C5QJLTXsurdHzujDh0T9Gb0E14mbpXR5B7K5Nr39d7iEdCfaY+mUAQ 4gyBN0YVdZO3e1c+/V5WT/fvqYmdyW/EAzrSdB4ulyGEJVna0v8XEjfjFbsaGfYF4pWY HiLuwB788BAUnOty1K1TzceC/15ARBazgGbdAT80JNDRvhBjzLg3IsxfY96UFUhTHHOK Emjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=86mikesk5y0hLJuq7PF255VU6jtdry0Ee9rsgjOZ6sc=; b=JoAz5kNV+6yta3LGEHXaJYPzyBX+VXnyMP14iSLLJw6FhcJBWXC9lTBhGowmQpIuCC rmwzF3l6WixhL4YMSAHzMDx0Pq8ALTHmjmwbe9gG0xOW572NsP/0rwtT+y9U4r0PyJxr T7GF7NEmCfi9jPaKJf3gZoQ7Ku7zX7bnn5sy82emkQv/NJUeHynmR5YBQAwAdc1wbMTk JwtMqVcnVh+E7Nv/2/wT9iFbUJhjtpQL760GYc3Lx7YIkgZbljJ7t8t4c5KJRhKHfAiR riREbJrciK0bVdmqiakRRWLNEpiO3R16BYB0nqjERrcGbyE8PRgmCDNrE6SS5rEMDVNA wMJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o128si11114550pgo.51.2019.05.27.05.45.24; Mon, 27 May 2019 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726394AbfE0MoP (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 May 2019 08:44:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51800 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725991AbfE0MoO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2019 08:44:14 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21369ADE3; Mon, 27 May 2019 12:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:44:11 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-mm , Johannes Weiner , Tim Murray , Joel Fernandes , Suren Baghdasaryan , Daniel Colascione , Shakeel Butt , Sonny Rao , Brian Geffon , linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 7/7] mm: madvise support MADV_ANONYMOUS_FILTER and MADV_FILE_FILTER Message-ID: <20190527124411.GC1658@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190520035254.57579-1-minchan@kernel.org> <20190520035254.57579-8-minchan@kernel.org> <20190520092801.GA6836@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190521025533.GH10039@google.com> <20190521062628.GE32329@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190527075811.GC6879@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527075811.GC6879@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 27-05-19 16:58:11, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:26:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 21-05-19 11:55:33, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:28:01AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > [cc linux-api] > > > > > > > > On Mon 20-05-19 12:52:54, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > > System could have much faster swap device like zRAM. In that case, swapping > > > > > is extremely cheaper than file-IO on the low-end storage. > > > > > In this configuration, userspace could handle different strategy for each > > > > > kinds of vma. IOW, they want to reclaim anonymous pages by MADV_COLD > > > > > while it keeps file-backed pages in inactive LRU by MADV_COOL because > > > > > file IO is more expensive in this case so want to keep them in memory > > > > > until memory pressure happens. > > > > > > > > > > To support such strategy easier, this patch introduces > > > > > MADV_ANONYMOUS_FILTER and MADV_FILE_FILTER options in madvise(2) like > > > > > that /proc//clear_refs already has supported same filters. > > > > > They are filters could be Ored with other existing hints using top two bits > > > > > of (int behavior). > > > > > > > > madvise operates on top of ranges and it is quite trivial to do the > > > > filtering from the userspace so why do we need any additional filtering? > > > > > > > > > Once either of them is set, the hint could affect only the interested vma > > > > > either anonymous or file-backed. > > > > > > > > > > With that, user could call a process_madvise syscall simply with a entire > > > > > range(0x0 - 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) but either of MADV_ANONYMOUS_FILTER and > > > > > MADV_FILE_FILTER so there is no need to call the syscall range by range. > > > > > > > > OK, so here is the reason you want that. The immediate question is why > > > > cannot the monitor do the filtering from the userspace. Slightly more > > > > work, all right, but less of an API to expose and that itself is a > > > > strong argument against. > > > > > > What I should do if we don't have such filter option is to enumerate all of > > > vma via /proc//maps and then parse every ranges and inode from string, > > > which would be painful for 2000+ vmas. > > > > Painful is not an argument to add a new user API. If the existing API > > suits the purpose then it should be used. If it is not usable, we can > > think of a different way. > > I measured 1568 vma parsing overhead of /proc//maps in ARM64 modern > mobile CPU. It takes 60ms and 185ms on big cores depending on cpu governor. > It's never trivial. This is not the only option. Have you tried to simply use /proc//map_files interface? This will provide you with all the file backed mappings. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs