Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030225AbVKPIgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:36:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030230AbVKPIgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:36:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:8860 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030225AbVKPIgy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:36:54 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:38:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com, werner@almesberger.net References: <20051110090920.8083.54147.sendpatchset@cherry.local> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511160938.14992.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 459 Lines: 14 On Wednesday 16 November 2005 08:57, Magnus Damm wrote: > > Sorry, but which one did not work very well? CKRM memory controller or > NUMA emulation + CPUSETS? Using simulated nodes for controlling memory. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/