Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 23:11:02 +0300
From:   Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: reparent slab memory on cgroup removal
Message-ID: <20190528201102.63t6rtsrpq7yac44@esperanza>
References: <20190521200735.2603003-1-guro@fb.com>
 <20190521200735.2603003-7-guro@fb.com>
 <20190528183302.zv75bsxxblc6v4dt@esperanza>
 <20190528195808.GA27847@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190528195808.GA27847@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:58:17PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> It looks like outstanding questions are:
> 1) synchronization around the dying flag
> 2) removing CONFIG_SLOB in 2/7
> 3) early sysfs_slab_remove()
> 4) mem_cgroup_from_kmem in 7/7
> 
> Please, let me know if I missed anything.

Also, I think that it might be possible to get rid of RCU call in kmem
cache destructor, because the cgroup subsystem already handles it and
we could probably piggyback - see my comment to 5/7. Not sure if it's
really necessary, since we already have RCU in SLUB, but worth looking
into, I guess, as it might simplify the code a bit.