Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030315AbVKPNN1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:13:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965250AbVKPNN1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:13:27 -0500 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:47582 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965251AbVKPNN0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:13:26 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/15] misc: Make x86 doublefault handling optional Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:13:07 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <8.282480653@selenic.com> In-Reply-To: <8.282480653@selenic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511160713.07632.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 861 Lines: 24 On Friday 11 November 2005 02:35, Matt Mackall wrote: > This adds configurable support for doublefault reporting on x86 ... > +config DOUBLEFAULT > + depends X86 > + default y if X86 > + bool "Enable doublefault exception handler" if EMBEDDED > + help > + This option allows trapping of rare doublefault exceptions that > + would otherwise cause a system to silently reboot. Disabling > this + option saves about 4k. > + What causes doublefaults? Is it triggerable from userspace, or is it something funky the kernel does? Trying to figure out when it would be worth using this... Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/