Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5679230ybi; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:45:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzLBIwkpHvCjb382FnE7UiuYHAeaNYiUT3dK9sjbwvfI10LlQMziBPAR2a0zxllhPvb9Xb X-Received: by 2002:a63:fd4a:: with SMTP id m10mr130420882pgj.302.1559090730563; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:45:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559090730; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A5TEtarypR7+tMJhlsZPZldhw5/rk4xXeCmoQP4s8t7gezy5pxcYMabZod5BhfnC/w d29MpswBVxj3DVJGavsCyHmQ22Y15p6hwJjErouG3GdQgC06MfLOCXWD+XPier4mJgNG yTPPzcyebc0LyVHl5hjtj5Sgk+7meVq2emPiHl24PsENHxjE1zvHYOMf7vtQci0WLLIM oiKSkvAj8CTF1cc3d6W8cbn1Y0UBJ6i+wXDUYwz9oTO3xUVxZslSJdjc5jC0jiMLAAmA PIBUgIeA88HBjYFG+aPEYCWgUffb8GlCXuH+mjSd6QBrO6wHtCrfjDoxlM/glQ2XXk4T njeQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4LjsJlmfDNOcmjVGxA0MZoe4QrGaxA4brraJRIV6wHE=; b=AUF8ZUJTbG6fQbPGaBwhW8QrzaZ+xl5rUsRaWHBngky9aSzaZSaNJU5tnxYvxD+TLL T3fDik+yPwLSPhboNfAXsVGdFc4goSWOsinx/SJuWxrmGoX34j0so4XUpYJFi/GLxjSN RFTAj0FX6A61fhBCgypEzr79OOknY1XlkBsKoXZmjYVXp3eIMrMFhh4JCkc0s+BV8YtZ P2zoVhfX823NF1elISBgSKvfhrTkTCczLjrxCTSAjS5Ywq56LLKQ6yV0+K5eXB2NGpqe VWTuW8dQ4+OueIwWulwzBLOaTIGkiE6a9qTQVcd0xTByUCfjWltON+NaylBTrnCn+tE3 oCMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w2si15514661pfq.110.2019.05.28.17.45.14; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726068AbfE2AoK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 May 2019 20:44:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39876 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725816AbfE2AoJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 20:44:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3A185362; Wed, 29 May 2019 00:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madcap2.tricolour.ca (ovpn-112-16.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0175D60BDF; Wed, 29 May 2019 00:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 20:43:52 -0400 From: Richard Guy Briggs To: Steve Grubb Cc: Paul Moore , Dan Walsh , Neil Horman , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Audit Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, omosnace@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, simo@redhat.com, Eric Paris , Serge Hallyn , ebiederm@xmission.com, Mrunal Patel Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V6 00/10] audit: implement container identifier Message-ID: <20190529004352.vvicec7nnk6pvkwt@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <509ea6b0-1ac8-b809-98c2-37c34dd98ca3@redhat.com> <3299293.RYyUlNkVNy@x2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3299293.RYyUlNkVNy@x2> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Wed, 29 May 2019 00:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-05-28 19:00, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 6:26:47 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:54 PM Daniel Walsh wrote: > > > On 4/22/19 9:49 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 7:38 AM Neil Horman > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:39:07PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > >>> Implement kernel audit container identifier. > > > >> > > > >> I'm sorry, I've lost track of this, where have we landed on it? Are we > > > >> good for inclusion? > > > > > > > > I haven't finished going through this latest revision, but unless > > > > Richard made any significant changes outside of the feedback from the > > > > v5 patchset I'm guessing we are "close". > > > > > > > > Based on discussions Richard and I had some time ago, I have always > > > > envisioned the plan as being get the kernel patchset, tests, docs > > > > ready (which Richard has been doing) and then run the actual > > > > implemented API by the userland container folks, e.g. cri-o/lxc/etc., > > > > to make sure the actual implementation is sane from their perspective. > > > > They've already seen the design, so I'm not expecting any real > > > > surprises here, but sometimes opinions change when they have actual > > > > code in front of them to play with and review. > > > > > > > > Beyond that, while the cri-o/lxc/etc. folks are looking it over, > > > > whatever additional testing we can do would be a big win. I'm > > > > thinking I'll pull it into a separate branch in the audit tree > > > > (audit/working-container ?) and include that in my secnext kernels > > > > that I build/test on a regular basis; this is also a handy way to keep > > > > it based against the current audit/next branch. If any changes are > > > > needed Richard can either chose to base those changes on audit/next or > > > > the separate audit container ID branch; that's up to him. I've done > > > > this with other big changes in other trees, e.g. SELinux, and it has > > > > worked well to get some extra testing in and keep the patchset "merge > > > > ready" while others outside the subsystem look things over. > > > > > > Mrunal Patel (maintainer of CRI-O) and I have reviewed the API, and > > > believe this is something we can work on in the container runtimes team > > > to implement the container auditing code in CRI-O and Podman. > > > > Thanks Dan. If I pulled this into a branch and built you some test > > kernels to play with, any idea how long it might take to get a proof > > of concept working on the cri-o side? > > We'd need to merge user space patches and let them use that instead of the > raw interface. I'm not going to merge user space until we are pretty sure the > patch is going into the kernel. I have an f29 test rpm of the userspace bits if that helps for testing: http://people.redhat.com/~rbriggs/ghak90/git-1db7e21/ Here's what it contains (minus the last patch): https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/compare/master...rgbriggs:ghau40-containerid-filter.v7.0 > -Steve > > > FWIW, I've also reached out to some of the LXC folks I know to get > > their take on the API. I think if we can get two different container > > runtimes to give the API a thumbs-up then I think we are in good shape > > with respect to the userspace interface. > > > > I just finished looking over the last of the pending audit kernel > > patches that were queued waiting for the merge window to open so this > > is next on my list to look at. I plan to start doing that > > tonight/tomorrow, and as long as the changes between v5/v6 are not > > that big, it shouldn't take too long. - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635