Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5835259ybi; Tue, 28 May 2019 21:23:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwY67N+OqYQIFkHCnrSfSwYs3qBO9KGDJgKHPGd2GH7hUVQv8ibDxwONq65b5CO08J4RB/v X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:850a:: with SMTP id bj10mr70870854plb.196.1559103801278; Tue, 28 May 2019 21:23:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559103801; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0GqAz2euzmevoL83VvHy/sl22DDExSJDGQZYTjRQH101eOtz3RDtz7Oh75pohYWxxX GHRAseVGd9iCkZLdxDd0Zkj78Y8OIWN1JXdOMmXlVTU7qGXLxEpGoUEJ88J5PT7hBV6x itn8LhzSWP9pIsa///3lIHsWMMhlNM26tsIIi1a17v/t2NTuF+YSf3Mdn1mRNu26MDwD tr5ov/KOqtbUNQfThpBeu2eVB/GYqGmLabaGLakZOTTz3IjAJT19Yu5PxTBF8ziqYrR/ r8VzeRhoOtZyWaZohxbelaZ/8Z6r6Rq4jcHwKDFY2H+cOOEnO9GRbLrTf0FOWIxS07Qw qxjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=7nJ9AppVKyvUluvZWFpXlSAi0rZtK59JezMICJhKck8=; b=MTKuwnwF2jdeMFqL87ut3SzqvIp/QHuQNNmdV0x2kkxOavVHxhxmSUQOeMR0ke50NW Jt6tzDusECZWFbtxZsnZsEgr7FsYqrjv4PxNDQdF7WN7h8JmqvDKhAyD9h85f3ScW+cx jwx8cLAbnszoKwcH+SDpyweb5S/ebProsrEniZkcrHiIh/FxbIPP7uniN/Ni+hw+3pBz An6E2GCsSZ+Vdv/SmI/tH0UNJscgWpn6C/iGw7auLqnmbTRjxHQe8Yr75tjpJpNIdfKk cUrTi02B6XmQQuSaWNvkoazRsKw35GTNfocAkkmjSyb7bIqCkyB6AWil7V6u1KJnH5P/ hjiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h34si25842823pld.42.2019.05.28.21.23.06; Tue, 28 May 2019 21:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725903AbfE2EWG (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 May 2019 00:22:06 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:36779 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725856AbfE2EWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 00:22:05 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45DHbm6RTRz9s4V; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:21:55 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix oops when kthread execs user process In-Reply-To: <20190528153224.GE20758@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1559046689-24091-1-git-send-email-92siuyang@gmail.com> <20190528140103.GT2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190528153224.GE20758@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:21:54 +1000 Message-ID: <877ea9q49p.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Will Deacon writes: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:01:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:31:29PM +0800, Young Xiao wrote: >> > When a kthread calls call_usermodehelper() the steps are: >> > 1. allocate current->mm >> > 2. load_elf_binary() >> > 3. populate current->thread.regs >> > >> > While doing this, interrupts are not disabled. If there is a perf >> > interrupt in the middle of this process (i.e. step 1 has completed >> > but not yet reached to step 3) and if perf tries to read userspace >> > regs, kernel oops. > > This seems to be because pt_regs(current) gives NULL for kthreads on Power. Right, we've done that since roughly forever in copy_thread(): int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long usp, unsigned long kthread_arg, struct task_struct *p) { ... /* Copy registers */ sp -= sizeof(struct pt_regs); childregs = (struct pt_regs *) sp; if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { /* kernel thread */ memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs)); childregs->gpr[1] = sp + sizeof(struct pt_regs); ... p->thread.regs = NULL; /* no user register state */ See commit from 2002: https://github.com/mpe/linux-fullhistory/commit/c0a96c0918d21d8a99270e94d9c4a4a322d04581#diff-edb76bfcc84905163f34d24d2aad3f3aR187 > From the initial report [1], it doesn't look like the mm isn't initialised, > but rather than we're dereferencing a NULL pt_regs pointer somehow for the > current task (see previous comment). I don't see how that can happen on > arm64, given that we put the pt_regs on the kernel stack which is allocated > during fork. We have the regs on the stack too (see above), but we're explicitly NULL'ing the link from task->thread. Looks like on arm64 and x86 there is no link from task->thread, instead you get from task to pt_regs via task_stack_page(). That actually seems potentially fishy given the comment on task_stack_page() about the stack going away for exiting tasks. We should probably be NULL'ing the regs pointer in free_thread_stack() or similar. Though that race mustn't be happening because other arches would see it. Or are we just wrong and kthreads should have non-NULL regs? I can't find another arch that does the same as us. cheers