Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030358AbVKPPJq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:09:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030362AbVKPPJq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:09:46 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.203]:4327 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030358AbVKPPJp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:09:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=X0UjNJOD5aSU8V75N/h2W2frLCfFJeCyFE24M5oBlNYiQ88Cnkn3W6UC+q9tojtcnIiuZOsKXe5qPPlG8cZNfb/88mfQtSEBlNuPnhpg9W+mYO/NIzNgGAZO/xCG96FFx6gPMY1XeLs5s1dEA6Aizi6TiSUdEPHOU6XkvEODlpI= Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0511160709r47c1a9afk18e47a83ced2743d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:09:44 -0800 From: Mark Knecht To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc1 - NForce4 PCI-E agpgart support? Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <1132153102.2834.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bdc1c8b0511160650k4a9e0575h29403a5de47af952@mail.gmail.com> <1132153102.2834.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1326 Lines: 31 On 11/16/05, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 06:50 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > Hi, > > I downloaded and built 2.6.15-rc1 as a test assuming Ingo will > > release -rt support for this one of these days. (No rush Ingo!) It > > booted on my AMD64 machine and is running fine AFAICT. > > > > One thing I was expecting to see was agpgart support for the > > NForce4 chipset. Is this something that's coming or am I missing where > > the configuration is done? > > > > I have a PCI-Express based Radeon and would like to get better > > performance. I'm presuming that agpgart support is part of that > > solution? (As it was on earlier architectures?) > > I'm pretty sure PCI-Express and AGP are mutually exclusive.... Ah, of course! My bad... They are different buses and connectors. I was really thinking more of the 'gart' part of the agpgart. Is there any requirement/need/value for something like a PCI-E-gart? Or does this relocation requirement go out the window somehow when a graphics device moves to PCI-Express? Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/