Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6012812ybi; Wed, 29 May 2019 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsUH6gw5Jq7qf5fPSxU/+w3l4gpqM+MhSJtRSxYh1nqNQx20jC35Vu1TcuY40DoGMkWwCb X-Received: by 2002:a65:6151:: with SMTP id o17mr28256427pgv.283.1559117663797; Wed, 29 May 2019 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559117663; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KVvQziyINUyWaqPcdW8Z5XJ75Qm7G6YmykTpY6ev16APh9YQi8rpP5K9c2lCJNUkee eMyeJoAaykI6BSvjAxeRX3APh/aq8FtquoCJTHpVuVdl7gioQJCfPQ3c8CBCibUCkVCV RQIvr/8ITLaNDkLXRQ0F6L+l6He56ARxkqdRgH2fOhYf6tWZXE6qOghtx5u2Hq8j81/W 2Vz12lakPJuFEVvoZeUiVOIa9nrGakPZPp7Krs3j7gVAHdgsy15HtepzIqom6WSGAI1e abTBdmme9/KFTKfb+XEHi9NqP7liztp3GO8MpyBthFqlBlf94eFWatfzcaoYccb6n9+t ZanA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:in-reply-to:references :subject:cc:to:from:date:message-id; bh=OVwox4dYzQpGjMI4X9Ret+Saj8Jn6sy9vErmwVB2AVs=; b=Pzo6ny4QcdzF7fRkdxYIkoZhxdMH+VexT1TaRQ2z7+fGIVbZYgMClqO6/bRdK3zQXp EZgKFVMJ0AkX2kX8OJoY8V27yw/96UyP9wXx1EUVcrBNpCxV9uOu6XFl9GwSJL5BO8kZ Hbf8wh1UIUsivh19o4CoW4r7/66dJcPMXx7RjVO9JEHcBojzFxvaI0OCK95rzWxhsiRg 1gMgkaZLqkptHjjxuCu4RqqeqBuETlo9ul3esSkqM7Npjrf/bCLbyDvoxpMK5DY4cxPB Z83F4lho54JPE5lGebW2DFyObbcc1cTCQq5YOVQ897mzWRNEi3JoBvQTTvhloxmWRReY nK+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si26199710plb.179.2019.05.29.01.14.08; Wed, 29 May 2019 01:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726535AbfE2IMP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 May 2019 04:12:15 -0400 Received: from prv1-mh.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.33]:48275 "EHLO prv1-mh.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725987AbfE2IMO (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 04:12:14 -0400 Received: from INET-PRV1-MTA by prv1-mh.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 29 May 2019 02:12:13 -0600 Message-Id: <5CEE3ED8020000F900068B85@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.1.1 Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 02:12:08 -0600 From: "Gang He" To: , , , "Wengang" Cc: , Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: add last unlock times in locking_state References: <20190523104047.14794-1-ghe@suse.com> <66083663-1d25-437b-ce98-07d200f446ab@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <66083663-1d25-437b-ce98-07d200f446ab@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Wengang, >>> On 2019/5/29 at 1:22, in message <66083663-1d25-437b-ce98-07d200f446ab@oracle.com>, Wengang wrote: > Hi Gang, > > This idea sounds cool! > Some comments in lines: > > On 05/23/2019 03:40 AM, Gang He wrote: >> ocfs2 file system uses locking_state file under debugfs to dump >> each ocfs2 file system's dlm lock resources, but the dlm lock >> resources in memory are becoming more and more after the files >> were touched by the user. it will become a bit difficult to analyze >> these dlm lock resource records in locking_state file by the upper >> scripts, though some files are not active for now, which were >> accessed long time ago. >> Then, I'd like to add last pr/ex unlock times in locking_state file >> for each dlm lock resource record, the the upper scripts can use >> last unlock time to filter inactive dlm lock resource record. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gang He >> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi >> --- >> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- >> fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c >> index af405586c5b1..dccf4136f8c1 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c >> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct > ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, >> struct ocfs2_mask_waiter *mw, int ret) >> { >> u32 usec; >> - ktime_t kt; >> + ktime_t last, kt; >> struct ocfs2_lock_stats *stats; >> >> if (level == LKM_PRMODE) >> @@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct > ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, >> else >> return; >> >> - kt = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), mw->mw_lock_start); >> + last = ktime_get(); > Will ktime_get_real() be better than ktime_get() here? > Per description, > ktime_get: > Useful for reliable timestamps and measuring short time intervals > accurately. Starts at system boot time but stops during suspend. > ktime_get_real: > Returns the time in relative to the UNIX epoch starting in 1970 using > the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), same as gettimeofday() user space. > > Since ktime_get() returnis time since boot time, this value is > meaningless when compared to those from a different node in cluster, right? Ok, maybe we can use ktime_get_real_seconds to get the seconds, but we need to use 64bit time64_t type to save the value and dump to the user-space. Thanks Gang > > And we need a "__kernel_long_t" to rather than a "u32"? > > >> + kt = ktime_sub(last, mw->mw_lock_start); >> usec = ktime_to_us(kt); >> >> stats->ls_gets++; >> @@ -474,6 +475,8 @@ static void ocfs2_update_lock_stats(struct > ocfs2_lock_res *res, int level, >> >> if (ret) >> stats->ls_fail++; >> + >> + stats->ls_last = ktime_to_timespec(last).tv_sec; >> } >> > Though maybe ocfs2_update_lock_stats() is designed to be called for each > successful lock request, > seems current code calls it even when it returns with -EAGAIN which > breaks the design. That's not introduced by your change, well, it may > lead to wrong stats... > > thanks, > wengang > >> static inline void ocfs2_track_lock_refresh(struct ocfs2_lock_res > *lockres) >> @@ -3093,8 +3096,10 @@ static void *ocfs2_dlm_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, > void *v, loff_t *pos) >> * - Lock stats printed >> * New in version 3 >> * - Max time in lock stats is in usecs (instead of nsecs) >> + * New in version 4 >> + * - Add last pr/ex unlock times in secs >> */ >> -#define OCFS2_DLM_DEBUG_STR_VERSION 3 >> +#define OCFS2_DLM_DEBUG_STR_VERSION 4 >> static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) >> { >> int i; >> @@ -3145,6 +3150,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void > *v) >> # define lock_max_prmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_prmode.ls_max) >> # define lock_max_exmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_exmode.ls_max) >> # define lock_refresh(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_refresh) >> +# define lock_last_prmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_prmode.ls_last) >> +# define lock_last_exmode(_l) ((_l)->l_lock_exmode.ls_last) >> #else >> # define lock_num_prmode(_l) (0) >> # define lock_num_exmode(_l) (0) >> @@ -3155,6 +3162,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void > *v) >> # define lock_max_prmode(_l) (0) >> # define lock_max_exmode(_l) (0) >> # define lock_refresh(_l) (0) >> +# define lock_last_prmode(_l) (0) >> +# define lock_last_exmode(_l) (0) >> #endif >> /* The following seq_print was added in version 2 of this output */ >> seq_printf(m, "%u\t" >> @@ -3165,6 +3174,8 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void > *v) >> "%llu\t" >> "%u\t" >> "%u\t" >> + "%u\t" >> + "%u\t" >> "%u\t", >> lock_num_prmode(lockres), >> lock_num_exmode(lockres), >> @@ -3174,7 +3185,9 @@ static int ocfs2_dlm_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void > *v) >> lock_total_exmode(lockres), >> lock_max_prmode(lockres), >> lock_max_exmode(lockres), >> - lock_refresh(lockres)); >> + lock_refresh(lockres), >> + lock_last_prmode(lockres), >> + lock_last_exmode(lockres)); >> >> /* End the line */ >> seq_printf(m, "\n"); >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h >> index 1f029fbe8b8d..8efa022684f4 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h >> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct ocfs2_lock_stats { >> >> /* Storing max wait in usecs saves 24 bytes per inode */ >> u32 ls_max; /* Max wait in USEC */ >> + u32 ls_last; /* Last unlock time in SEC */ >> }; >> #endif >>