Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6243060ybi; Wed, 29 May 2019 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJU775ASC2WigTBwkcoAB7RhhZlz+oZMZjg5BCQqeeOstzXoxGF8be80FaxFbBEW7D/Ibe X-Received: by 2002:a63:4509:: with SMTP id s9mr69720660pga.231.1559131815075; Wed, 29 May 2019 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559131815; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tAu/ut8HlPOeY6mQhlKJF88Jbyz3rq/5W8jO4pm5VFSc69D7Q1dWyfY2GMT8w39Ra+ lEB9HYhG4oTeKNfJwLrijNthnOavf8Ie8YdMHhevl4kwoArXonJ9UcZlPjTe5I3Wh+vQ CEXJDhiGiScEuMuAOE1fPR4sP/aTUZParPtyOBoUs36vcmrGqSf3ognELPlXuzI3sXOT +NNBLHmkSX4jk8Gg0Ceo9jEtVOrspohbue7DtSnFkBlVMLu0PFn/FAoTwFQqKe8HCJQ4 8m6+rsQEg/4ithaEqtwtMqr7DR1NQCXa/Pa7xiYsfpwbA0UblN7G/ox1Lp9k7bMoXeHH yBfQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=l3YLei1Mn7YpWoZQFIxKHClQ56sSwvNrz+OYTy7GHyI=; b=bmKo6c+PJHEpzBAQ3VyB0pNRCVi2n4Z5S+2uA6h8X+iqAbpn/vMQmzXADugEsEW5lR Qmob0NaBMr1M+zXtc5frWRJMMmj7OPvEbHDjEyhtPFSfwUja2BmiQOpiDod0Y89g23Oi xyz0DEeWk9eB4PBA1SfobYfotzZzRFLvnLOum+FwGSN6pJnEQXO/J9BkaboWXptKFZSq RLK6hHS4vlXor/ln+fCVPR7TXN38dEnaytItrR11qfR92/c2EXT3SvXIwu3vhRJQTivC PQCXpR0kXQHYA7MzBLOuASflB+mY4mNPN7ND3tNJDOvOfqMMXZZV4iinrwbWLam6Sn+H 30pA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si24101599pgp.9.2019.05.29.05.09.56; Wed, 29 May 2019 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726820AbfE2MGw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 May 2019 08:06:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57374 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725894AbfE2MGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 08:06:52 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (unknown [12.156.218.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D455120644; Wed, 29 May 2019 12:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 08:06:48 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Johannes Erdfelt , Joe Lawrence , Jessica Yu , Miroslav Benes , Ingo Molnar , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops caused by race between livepatch and ftrace Message-ID: <20190529080648.0e001bfd@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20190520194915.GB1646@sventech.com> <90f78070-95ec-ce49-1641-19d061abecf4@redhat.com> <20190520210905.GC1646@sventech.com> <20190520211931.vokbqxkx5kb6k2bz@treble> <20190520173910.6da9ddaf@gandalf.local.home> <20190521141629.bmk5onsaab26qoaw@treble> <20190521104204.47d4e175@gandalf.local.home> <20190521164227.bxdff77kq7fgl5lp@treble> <20190521125319.04ac8b6c@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 May 2019 13:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > From: Josh Poimboeuf > > > Subject: [PATCH] livepatch: Fix ftrace module text permissions race > > > > Thanks, > > > > I'll try to find some time to test this as well. > > Steve, Jessica, any final word on this? I was under the impression that Josh was going to send an updated patch (and a properly sent one). Patches embedded in other emails don't get flagged by my internal patchwork, so they usually get ignored. -- Steve