Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault()
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
References: <1559133285-27986-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <20190529124120.GF4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Message-ID: <e5834e61-d6ac-39cc-6cbf-70b80b841db0@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 18:29:06 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190529124120.GF4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 05/29/2019 06:11 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 06:04:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for page fault handling in
>> do_page_fault(). This has been boot tested on arm64 platform along with
>> some stress test but just build tested on others.
> 
> These all seem to be cleanups, which is fine, but I just wanted to make
> sure I'm not missing something that should be aiming for 5.2. Are there
> actually fixes in this series?

The following one might qualify (I would not insist though) but right now
this is not very problematic.

- arm64/mm: Drop mmap_sem before calling __do_kernel_fault() 

> 
> (in future, it's best to post fixes separately so I don't miss them)

Sure will do.