Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030278AbVKPRlU (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:41:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030285AbVKPRlU (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:41:20 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:50354 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030278AbVKPRlT (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:41:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:41:16 -0800 (PST) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: George Anzinger cc: Alex Williamson , rmk+serial@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2) In-Reply-To: <437B6C9C.3060307@mvista.com> Message-ID: References: <1132158489.5457.10.camel@tdi> <437B6C9C.3060307@mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 744 Lines: 20 On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, George Anzinger wrote: > Could you _please_ not put inline patches after the signature mark ("-- "). In my mailer (mozilla) > this causes the patch to be greyed out and, more importantly, NOT included in a reply. This, in > turn, makes it hard to comment on details in the patch. Would it help if Alex used the documented canonical patch format, using "---" instead of "-- "? I sorta doubt it. BTW, George, please hit Return/Enter around column 70+... Thanks. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/