Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6365550ybi; Wed, 29 May 2019 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJugFFJDjrQ237s5yrsCktHRJdxcJoSu3rtYbJ0hn46odpXDTaT2bE9fH610XsumLQdJAn X-Received: by 2002:a65:52c8:: with SMTP id z8mr69084971pgp.10.1559137935169; Wed, 29 May 2019 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559137935; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=prjKMYVQzrU/cNyuXUChiDt5Udmfxn6S2UHtPPiKxcUxuFpRPyWVScZADkhR+GUgO6 ybNq39P2/NtMseK0qxtg8TckU2IqGIhz1DG6iLQXe9vuyVYbwsOq4cgOOIPPrnqLsZsV 1QXdh0EfahVTTJHKpJUuQ4wPQ23+UJG9nP8HuaShoVnJjPpVSBz4z6vpQN3yQTbOoDOy OlcoDmso02uFJ4CbtAfNGd9rJvokl3PPdNcuDaJEDGk88i5kghiLNxlSwGYTKwh1ZZVl g7X6yV+4pt4UCod5XszBzX6Qkjlp+W3ivPqz4jnMXE40E2mqMsKCrA/Exaci8swWHQUa CW7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=pXbwZC7yMCSC0xaKyVpYpOp44NGcKOyc0gB6LQK+9Ow=; b=C3jLGbKaqWJTUi8eZ/yWTU9S+6eOkOeOBg/EkbH28x3mz3fit7L5R0+bSP4pGDzuvv N9cmcHSAIehMQf8qV6UIP/2Gqmpvk4XjCAFMFuZTlh8XhM/bT2zGCgIQU8Hjn6MfFcsL 9MgnwmP9ujyLmpEmOaqloDPnGWyhXWttYSYFyFmUa8d/0TIPqW/SnUIqCXt+q67S+0vY gdzOnenJE2AWOes072vtYG1vjcMbXtvE4zwGCwzmXpURZ7J3I6+KDxUZ6mlXpJkdkpCW oAHRFAQL25+AikBFfjR1J55ainBuh4u9BVvgFETbjksq+bawjyeu2XP0aX1ovzeWgfsH QtNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k10si25324165plt.133.2019.05.29.06.51.59; Wed, 29 May 2019 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727412AbfE2Nud (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 May 2019 09:50:33 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:41756 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726702AbfE2Nuc (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 09:50:32 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A5222B4; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 07:50:31 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jani Nikula , Markus Heiser , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Oleksandr Natalenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] docs/gpu: fix a documentation build break in i915.rst Message-ID: <20190529075031.5275d065@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20190522205034.25724-1-corbet@lwn.net> <20190522205034.25724-7-corbet@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 May 2019 08:54:16 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Documentation/gpu/i915.rst is not included in the TOC tree, but newer > > versions of sphinx parse it anyway. That leads to this hard build failure: > > It is included I think: Documentation/gpu/index.rst -> drivers.rst -> > i915.rst. With that corrected A-b: me. > > btw this patch didn't go to intel-gfx and all i915 maintainers, I > think per get_maintainers.pl it should have. Just asking since I had a > few patches of my own where get_maintainers.pl didn't seem to do the > right thing somehow. It is included, just a level down and I wasn't paying attention. In any case, this patch needs to be dropped; the kerneldoc comment changes I sent (and Jani acked) are the better fix for this problem. Thanks, jon