Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To:     ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, shuah@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpupower : frequency-set -r option misses the last cpu in related cpu list
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 16:21:08 +0200
Message-ID: <1825219.HmmgU4QcfA@house>
In-Reply-To: <CAHZ_5Ww2fMBGUR4gzNRZs-uV16j-hAevxT-vbNULRPsmKA7dow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190529093033.30068-1-huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAHZ_5Ww2fMBGUR4gzNRZs-uV16j-hAevxT-vbNULRPsmKA7dow@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:12:34 PM CEST Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:02 PM Abhishek Goel

...
 
> >                                 bitmask_setbit(cpus_chosen, cpus->cpu);
> >                                 cpus = cpus->next;
> >                         
> >                         }
> > 
> > +                       /* Set the last cpu in related cpus list */
> > +                       bitmask_setbit(cpus_chosen, cpus->cpu);
> 
> Perhaps you could convert the while() loop to a do ..  while(). That
> should will ensure
> that we terminate the loop after setting the last valid CPU.

It would do exactly the same, right?
IMHO it's not worth the extra hassle of resubmitting. Setting the last value 
outside a while loop is rather common.

I do not have a CPU with related cores at hand.
If you tested this it would be nice to see this pushed:

Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>

Thanks!

   Thomas