Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030294AbVKPSC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030325AbVKPSC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:56 -0500 Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk ([213.162.97.75]:64402 "EHLO mail.metronet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030294AbVKPSC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:02:56 -0500 From: Alistair John Strachan To: Mark Knecht Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc1 - NForce4 PCI-E agpgart support? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:02:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Arjan van de Ven , LKML References: <5bdc1c8b0511160650k4a9e0575h29403a5de47af952@mail.gmail.com> <1132153102.2834.37.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <5bdc1c8b0511160709r47c1a9afk18e47a83ced2743d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0511160709r47c1a9afk18e47a83ced2743d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511161802.47244.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1620 Lines: 39 On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:09, Mark Knecht wrote: > On 11/16/05, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 06:50 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I downloaded and built 2.6.15-rc1 as a test assuming Ingo will > > > release -rt support for this one of these days. (No rush Ingo!) It > > > booted on my AMD64 machine and is running fine AFAICT. > > > > > > One thing I was expecting to see was agpgart support for the > > > NForce4 chipset. Is this something that's coming or am I missing where > > > the configuration is done? > > > > > > I have a PCI-Express based Radeon and would like to get better > > > performance. I'm presuming that agpgart support is part of that > > > solution? (As it was on earlier architectures?) > > > > I'm pretty sure PCI-Express and AGP are mutually exclusive.... > > Ah, of course! My bad... They are different buses and connectors. I > was really thinking more of the 'gart' part of the agpgart. > > Is there any requirement/need/value for something like a PCI-E-gart? > Or does this relocation requirement go out the window somehow when a > graphics device moves to PCI-Express? Yes, you don't need it with PCIe. -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/