Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp6638800ybi; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:40:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQRqZWML6jSxduwrggh/na/G04rLcy/HfChSmpCqIulzvgQXIOPkCGHZq5yMavQsmXESbv X-Received: by 2002:a63:6f8e:: with SMTP id k136mr140651398pgc.104.1559151631228; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:40:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559151631; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XO8Uw2uxmMfTau+ySlSEp/5i9WK4CSOUNnYRqmiU5h8owFWdbsm1ltvL3Q7kZ5Uteo 3RRfJGc2XAIFvqETqT9++krygNXMNumjeBQUCH3h0oIvwgp3PRTx5mkrn63NZ8CsDwX8 hygyx8LvTmvqOXWpZ/P8HAIf/Cd0wW/hyg3KQ10Vo7GqV/a3aZzZ1BPQ3Ku2JBbfsScb PNBCO6X8YyKXkfoceHrXuTkLwznhKGpN5Vji2cGG9izEjlmNHJtGNijhr8BJg7M7VnP2 2wmJvAKWKOr+1pSX3OMXOL7kzBExwfkA3cwr9vwVgi0U5GF3kdYAqbEHlq4Ft/IaoycK aEmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=/5Oi8N0ZREjJkRfjtcxC6NPWkPIeD5rERBNOHe1bVQA=; b=jfTOZwoLC/w577F9pyTNYRc0xutNCBt6jo7XDzq308B0iJVtra9GFwUKqBfxcEUl/H ELEi0sa5NhiEVehHJcZmTvLIL4RhZ7aODYczsY0Sd1yT4K10RDCPq0aOmV9RAAqow6Jx YGW4vaE9d0VyA5MBlpokcji6prxzuHOKJdSoyeETlvIAlaLmpwJe9GwVfm/Yzk8icKZA a42l903+0D3DR3nmYdhLCLwUggujksCn5d9QhY1/T81wawNLWtuydM3mu8RPd9dQRAEN Qr1hYpT3bQeqnnwRYjeC3KEY4YUHlEohU36GoqRldYOfSpjwbKzpvYM/deWyCPYlu+W8 6KLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j39si244220plb.319.2019.05.29.10.40.13; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727169AbfE2Rie (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 May 2019 13:38:34 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50096 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725917AbfE2Rid (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 13:38:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0CF341; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.75] (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.75]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8DAC3F5AF; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Allwinner H6 Mali GPU support To: Tomeu Vizoso , =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= Cc: David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , Neil Armstrong , Steven Price , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, open list , dri-devel , Linux IOMMU , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" References: <20190521161102.29620-1-peron.clem@gmail.com> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <4ff02295-6c34-791b-49f4-6558a92ad7a3@arm.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:38:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/05/2019 16:09, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 18:11, Clément Péron wrote: >> > [snip] >> [ 345.204813] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1 >> [ 345.209617] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA >> 0x0000000002400400 > > From what I can see here, 0x0000000002400400 points to the first byte > of the first submitted job descriptor. > > So mapping buffers for the GPU doesn't seem to be working at all on > 64-bit T-760. > > Steven, Robin, do you have any idea of why this could be? I tried rolling back to the old panfrost/nondrm shim, and it works fine with kbase, and I also found that T-820 falls over in the exact same manner, so the fact that it seemed to be common to the smaller 33-bit designs rather than anything to do with the other job_descriptor_size/v4/v5 complication turned out to be telling. [ as an aside, are 64-bit jobs actually known not to work on v4 GPUs, or is it just that nobody's yet observed a 64-bit blob driving one? ] Long story short, it appears that 'Mali LPAE' is also lacking the start level notion of VMSA, and expects a full 4-level table even for <40 bits when level 0 effectively redundant. Thus walking the 3-level table that io-pgtable comes back with ends up going wildly wrong. The hack below seems to do the job for me; if Clément can confirm (on T-720 you'll still need the userspace hack to force 32-bit jobs as well) then I think I'll cook up a proper refactoring of the allocator to put things right. Robin. ----->8----- diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c index 546968d8a349..f29da6e8dc08 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c @@ -1023,12 +1023,14 @@ arm_mali_lpae_alloc_pgtable(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, void *cookie) iop = arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1(cfg, cookie); if (iop) { u64 mair, ttbr; + struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_ops_to_data(&iop->ops); + data->levels = 4; /* Copy values as union fields overlap */ mair = cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.mair[0]; ttbr = cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr[0];