Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030457AbVKPTys (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:54:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030459AbVKPTys (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:54:48 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.205]:14267 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030457AbVKPTyr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:54:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ji3SXgfRJ3f4iIdJX+Aqag7gaQ6cSL29cuxfbYquK5JwhgAghIBWOOLo7Vx1q7SHLVfDUBqE5IfUFNbKZReUpU/2raVQsr/4X07KzyvFMnNTUMtIWRMsKGKiHeFY+AlMhq/0Xk2nRpkiaa3V+TuPnr80Dk3aJElr1ShIbmuA6Es= Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0511161154y374b131jaa6c78badc221dd0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:54:47 -0800 From: Mark Knecht To: Alistair John Strachan Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc1 - NForce4 PCI-E agpgart support? Cc: Arjan van de Ven , LKML In-Reply-To: <200511161849.51319.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bdc1c8b0511160650k4a9e0575h29403a5de47af952@mail.gmail.com> <200511161802.47244.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <5bdc1c8b0511161025q20569fa4hd8c187503e9af1c2@mail.gmail.com> <200511161849.51319.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 40 On 11/16/05, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2005 18:25, Mark Knecht wrote: > > On 11/16/05, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:09, Mark Knecht wrote: > [snip] > > > > > > > > Is there any requirement/need/value for something like a PCI-E-gart? > > > > Or does this relocation requirement go out the window somehow when a > > > > graphics device moves to PCI-Express? > > > > > > Yes, you don't need it with PCIe. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Alistair. > > > > Thanks Alistair. > > > > So, should I be able to see better grapohics performance on my Radeon > > PCI-E device with 2.6.15-rc1? Are there setups I should test for you > > guys? (I'm not a developer.) > > I think the latest drm tree (which might be part of -rc1, I haven't checked > the changelogs) includes support for several PCIe radeons. Your best bet > would probably be to compile in DRM (kernel side), check dmesg that it's > detected your card, then download the latest snapshot of X11R6 6.9/7.0 and > build it. > > The alternative is ATI's proprietary driver which probably already supports > your card. Thanks. I'll see if this old guitar player can get all of that done. Cheers, Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/