Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 022/128] Revert "btrfs: Honour FITRIM range constraints during free space trim"
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 20:05:54 -0700
Message-Id: <20190530030438.866703877@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190530030432.977908967@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190530030432.977908967@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reverts commit 038ec2c13e0d1f7b9d45a081786f18f75b65f11b.

There is currently no corresponding patch in master due to additional
changes that would be significantly different from plain revert in the
respective stable branch.

The range argument was not handled correctly and could cause trim to
overlap allocated areas or reach beyond the end of the device. The
address space that fitrim normally operates on is in logical
coordinates, while the discards are done on the physical device extents.
This distinction cannot be made with the current ioctl interface and
caused the confusion.

The bug depends on the layout of block groups and does not always
happen. The whole-fs trim (run by default by the fstrim tool) is not
affected.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   25 ++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -11150,9 +11150,9 @@ int btrfs_error_unpin_extent_range(struc
  * transaction.
  */
 static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struct btrfs_device *device,
-				   struct fstrim_range *range, u64 *trimmed)
+				   u64 minlen, u64 *trimmed)
 {
-	u64 start = range->start, len = 0;
+	u64 start = 0, len = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	*trimmed = 0;
@@ -11188,8 +11188,8 @@ static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struc
 			atomic_inc(&trans->use_count);
 		spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
 
-		ret = find_free_dev_extent_start(trans, device, range->minlen,
-						 start, &start, &len);
+		ret = find_free_dev_extent_start(trans, device, minlen, start,
+						 &start, &len);
 		if (trans)
 			btrfs_put_transaction(trans);
 
@@ -11201,16 +11201,6 @@ static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struc
 			break;
 		}
 
-		/* If we are out of the passed range break */
-		if (start > range->start + range->len - 1) {
-			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
-			ret = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-
-		start = max(range->start, start);
-		len = min(range->len, len);
-
 		ret = btrfs_issue_discard(device->bdev, start, len, &bytes);
 		up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
 		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
@@ -11221,10 +11211,6 @@ static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struc
 		start += len;
 		*trimmed += bytes;
 
-		/* We've trimmed enough */
-		if (*trimmed >= range->len)
-			break;
-
 		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
 			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
 			break;
@@ -11309,7 +11295,8 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_root *roo
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	devices = &fs_info->fs_devices->devices;
 	list_for_each_entry(device, devices, dev_list) {
-		ret = btrfs_trim_free_extents(device, range, &group_trimmed);
+		ret = btrfs_trim_free_extents(device, range->minlen,
+					      &group_trimmed);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_failed++;
 			dev_ret = ret;