Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030582AbVKQA2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:28:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030583AbVKQA2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:28:21 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:29875 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030582AbVKQA2U (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:28:20 -0500 Subject: Re: mmap over nfs leads to excessive system load From: Trond Myklebust To: Andrew Morton Cc: theonetruekenny@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051116162516.61cb1e6b.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20051116150141.29549.qmail@web34113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1132163057.8811.15.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116100053.44d81ae2.akpm@osdl.org> <1132166062.8811.30.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116110938.1bf54339.akpm@osdl.org> <1132171500.8811.37.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116133130.625cd19b.akpm@osdl.org> <1132177785.8811.57.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116141052.7994ab7d.akpm@osdl.org> <1132179796.8811.70.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116144450.47436560.akpm@osdl.org> <1132185969.8811.106.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051116162516.61cb1e6b.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:28:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1132187281.11869.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.953, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 1.05, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 26 On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > The accompanying NFS patch makes use of this in order to figure out when > > to flush the data correctly. > > OK. So with that patch, nfs_writepages() may still leave I/O pending, > uninitiated, yes? > > I don't understand why NFS hasn't been BUGging as it stands at present. It > has several end_page_writeback() calls but no set_page_writeback()s. > end_page_writeback() or rotate_reclaimable_page() will go BUG if the page > wasn't PageWriteback(). It does have SetPageWriteback() calls in the asynchronous writeback path. As you can see from the patch I just sent, I only needed to replace them with set_page_writebacks(). Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/