Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp663639ybi; Thu, 30 May 2019 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwS6tFwWQTOCH4ZohGicFCjNfXZUBhBGPT5LDH5NgYtWZXX4XlVZcjONopu142xa5vdQI4q X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:240c:: with SMTP id h12mr3265208pje.12.1559217362658; Thu, 30 May 2019 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559217362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cIRAHOD3DltkhHDVPT8kK20ye6yH1QAePtZvFIAgtez3CU7Yr0iGehSiLqj7Fo1MRG dQ5WpTBf/VcTqUBmG552ox1v7ddMFvXJTvjDBx/IUcR1ttBz6HELzO+DHMpzSRmBrrro 7Hj5/zQ2mq81ZU7nsiWezlBoK3iB8XHwY2vYHxP7w0XPGaAxnUEkXk5PiBBDBSNhYGT6 6MOY9HCq7bPo3cVfa0i/XVWoYj0MCz+CceoDNqOOKsAW9skdLZIHgLICDH9p25POdn1I pOiwJe+y5mxbiDx9XaMcSIH9UazprvivWDG78hQZPD86MXM52Izp67YSOTZopKdM37m5 mJJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=DKPSDFvI1itp1/VGOomArJWlJHwh8FSvbLRrEciUuKE=; b=jdN9cvDJ8XAQmF+WjsjzP2cvsy1Fkr/XZSzDJEsjvRvXSrKdfaCEOkcz1DLfISl21U 9kOIpVS+xNK3zCIzv1zd9p70gp+n0Hu25L80WLBGhMMZAbwc9Bkv6iQUlUNkD+HmtPuq QsPVEHhxZaCh0eUDe3Ur8oveH3waJzmQOP9U1RmaVbaJXYeSHCTqorwxSuSBH0uPKU5j URljkgg+YRhjnLniz6fVcOYc7uLJXxRkfTFGU9Xk8d+EE0tx2saQ6Epj56F3wpkBmVAu 1EWEJijcF5w/oUiPOTpt2VcRFRfLvkReCaREGx/5Az6+A44VfK2bfuWu+SZyss6pKQZO J15g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y25si2893280pga.81.2019.05.30.04.55.47; Thu, 30 May 2019 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727143AbfE3LyM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 May 2019 07:54:12 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33928 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727015AbfE3LyL (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 07:54:11 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4UBq6D0086182 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 07:54:10 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2stea2s7eu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 07:54:09 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 May 2019 12:54:08 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 30 May 2019 12:54:04 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4UBs3xg32375016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 May 2019 11:54:03 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599C611C04C; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:54:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E1E11C058; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:54:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.80.109]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:54:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ima: show rules with IMA_INMASK correctly From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com, mjg59@google.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 07:53:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190529133035.28724-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20190529133035.28724-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20190529133035.28724-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19053011-0008-0000-0000-000002EBEDCC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19053011-0009-0000-0000-00002258C21E Message-Id: <1559217231.4008.4.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-30_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905300090 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 15:30 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > Show the '^' character when a policy rule has flag IMA_INMASK. > > Fixes: 80eae209d63ac ("IMA: allow reading back the current IMA policy") > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Thanks, queued. > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > index e0cc323f948f..ae4034f041c4 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > @@ -1146,10 +1146,10 @@ enum { > }; > > static const char *const mask_tokens[] = { > - "MAY_EXEC", > - "MAY_WRITE", > - "MAY_READ", > - "MAY_APPEND" > + "^MAY_EXEC", > + "^MAY_WRITE", > + "^MAY_READ", > + "^MAY_APPEND" > }; > > #define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), > @@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > struct ima_rule_entry *entry = v; > int i; > char tbuf[64] = {0,}; > + int offset = 0; > > rcu_read_lock(); > > @@ -1232,15 +1233,17 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > if (entry->flags & IMA_FUNC) > policy_func_show(m, entry->func); > > - if (entry->flags & IMA_MASK) { > + if ((entry->flags & IMA_MASK) || (entry->flags & IMA_INMASK)) { > + if (entry->flags & IMA_MASK) > + offset = 1; > if (entry->mask & MAY_EXEC) > - seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_exec)); > + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_exec) + offset); > if (entry->mask & MAY_WRITE) > - seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_write)); > + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_write) + offset); > if (entry->mask & MAY_READ) > - seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_read)); > + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_read) + offset); > if (entry->mask & MAY_APPEND) > - seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_append)); > + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_mask), mt(mask_append) + offset); > seq_puts(m, " "); > } >