Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 22:05:10 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/12] perf tools: Display eBPF code in intel_pt trace
Message-ID: <20190530140510.GD5927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
References: <20190508132010.14512-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
 <20190530105439.GA5927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
 <20190530120709.GA3669@krava>
 <20190530125709.GB5927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
 <20190530133645.GC21962@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190530133645.GC21962@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Arnaldo,

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:36:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

[...]

> One other way of testing this:
> 
> I used perf trace's use of BPF, using:
> 
> [root@quaco ~]# cat ~/.perfconfig
> [llvm]
> 	dump-obj = true
> 	clang-opt = -g
> [trace]
> 	add_events = /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c
> 	show_zeros = yes
> 	show_duration = no
> 	no_inherit = yes
> 	show_timestamp = no
> 	show_arg_names = no
> 	args_alignment = 40
> 	show_prefix = yes
> 
> For arm64 this needs fixing, tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c
> (its in the kernel sources) is still hard coded for x86_64 syscall numbers :-\

Thanks a lot for sharing this, I will test with this method and let you
and Jiri know the result in tomorrow.

[...]

Thanks,
Leo Yan